CVHL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. CV Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24490.16%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CV Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe CV Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

CV Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.168, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.182%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. CV Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CV Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. CV Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, CV Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 20.79x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 73.36%. CV Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.36%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24490.16%. On the other hand Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CV Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., analysts believe CV Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc..

CV Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.034, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.56%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CV Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CV Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CV Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1M. Notably, CV Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 13.03x for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 27.82%. CV Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Park National Corp.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24490.16%. On the other hand Park National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.72%. Given that CV Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park National Corp., analysts believe CV Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Park National Corp..

CV Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National Corp. has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.635%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National Corp. offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. CV Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp. pays out 45.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CV Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National Corp. quarterly revenues of $169.5M. CV Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Park National Corp.'s net income of $47.2M. Notably, CV Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park National Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 3.90x for Park National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransUnion has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.57%. CV Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat TransUnion's return on equity of 9.76%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24490.16%. On the other hand TransUnion has an analysts' consensus of $106.95 which suggests that it could grow by 28.25%. Given that CV Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than TransUnion, analysts believe CV Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than TransUnion.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransUnion has a beta of 1.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.973%.

CV Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransUnion offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. CV Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion pays out 29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CV Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TransUnion quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CV Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than TransUnion's net income of $100.2M. Notably, CV Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TransUnion's PE ratio is 39.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 3.70x for TransUnion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.