Financhill
Buy
60

AB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$41.59
Seasonality move :
8.4%
Day range:
$40.93 - $41.81
52-week range:
$32.28 - $43.30
Dividend yield:
8.35%
P/E ratio:
13.70x
P/S ratio:
10.83x
P/B ratio:
3.22x
Volume:
173.1K
Avg. volume:
171.4K
1-year change:
15.5%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$3.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$897.6M $0.85 557.02% -1.02% $41.14
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$544.6M $5.88 10.41% 94% $307.71
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$2.2B $0.59 1.71% 106.46% $24.73
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$138.8M $0.78 3.07% -6.91% $74.33
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$4.1B $2.20 -12.18% -43.01% $89.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$41.58 $41.14 $3.8B 13.70x $0.86 8.35% 10.83x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$271.69 $307.71 $7.6B 16.59x $0.01 0.02% 4.41x
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$23.14 $24.73 $12.1B 25.40x $0.32 5.53% 1.37x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$62.40 $74.33 $3.2B 19.59x $0.62 3.97% 5.81x
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
$2.48 -- $31.7M 37.24x $0.01 3.63% 3.03x
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$85.94 $89.08 $18.9B 12.51x $0.79 3.58% 1.24x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- 0.103 -- --
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
41.5% 1.109 29.85% 0.54x
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
52.41% 1.671 93.92% 0.84x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
20.31% 0.674 4.16% 1.23x
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
0.36% 1.345 1.29% 13.42x
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
25.24% 1.045 21.01% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- -- 17.42% 17.42% 100% $71.2M
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$520.1M $153M 10.47% 16.38% 28.92% $298.1M
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$1.7B $405.4M 1.78% 3.36% 17.27% -$55.4M
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$122.9M $49.6M 23.88% 29.77% 35% $74.5M
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
$4.2M $1.5M 1.84% 1.84% 34.48% -$32K
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
-- $248.4M 10.31% 13.92% 6.75% $979.8M

AllianceBernstein Holding LP vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AB or AMG?

    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 54.99%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    98.32% $6.87 $6.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.14, signalling downside risk potential of -1.05%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $307.71 which suggests that it could grow by 13.26%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    5 1 0
  • Is AB or AMG More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.21%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.35%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $529M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $290.9M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 4.41x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 13.70x -- $73.8M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    4.41x 16.59x $529M $290.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or BEN?

    Franklin Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 7.59%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    72.9% $0.21 $27.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.14, signalling downside risk potential of -1.05%. On the other hand Franklin Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.73 which suggests that it could grow by 6.86%. Given that Franklin Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Franklin Resources, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    3 4 2
  • Is AB or BEN More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.508%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.35%. Franklin Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 5.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays out 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $178.2M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while Franklin Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.37x for Franklin Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 13.70x -- $73.8M
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    1.37x 25.40x $2.3B $178.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or CNS?

    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 29.38%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    86.7% $0.81 $719.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.14, signalling downside risk potential of -1.05%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $74.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.12%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    1 0 0
  • Is AB or CNS More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.124%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.35%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.7M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 19.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 5.81x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 13.70x -- $73.8M
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    5.81x 19.59x $141.7M $41.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or GROW?

    U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 35.58%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    99.74% $0.12 $46.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.14, signalling downside risk potential of -1.05%. On the other hand U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than U.S. Global Investors, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than U.S. Global Investors, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is AB or GROW More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.036%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.35%. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than U.S. Global Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 3.03x for U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 13.70x -- $73.8M
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    3.03x 37.24x $4.2M $1.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or PFG?

    Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 6.35%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    -- $0.95 $16.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.14, signalling downside risk potential of -1.05%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.66%. Given that Principal Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Principal Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    1 7 1
  • Is AB or PFG More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.653%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.35%. Principal Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc. pays out 42.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.24x for Principal Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 13.70x -- $73.8M
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    1.24x 12.51x $3.7B $233.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4

Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock