Financhill
Buy
58

AB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$39.09
Seasonality move :
8.54%
Day range:
$38.60 - $39.24
52-week range:
$32.28 - $43.30
Dividend yield:
8.88%
P/E ratio:
12.88x
P/S ratio:
10.83x
P/B ratio:
3.03x
Volume:
141.6K
Avg. volume:
203.6K
1-year change:
6.03%
Market cap:
$3.6B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$3.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$897.6M $0.85 557.02% -1.07% $41.57
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$544.6M $5.88 10.41% 94.71% $339.71
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$2.2B $0.59 1.71% 92.79% $24.82
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$138.8M $0.78 3% -6.91% $71.67
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$4.1B $2.20 -12.08% -43.09% $90.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$39.09 $41.57 $3.6B 12.88x $0.86 8.88% 10.83x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$291.58 $339.71 $8.2B 17.80x $0.01 0.01% 4.73x
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$24.21 $24.82 $12.6B 26.58x $0.32 5.29% 1.43x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$63.22 $71.67 $3.2B 19.85x $0.62 3.92% 5.88x
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
$2.42 -- $30.9M 36.26x $0.01 3.73% 2.95x
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$89.59 $90.00 $19.7B 13.04x $0.79 3.44% 1.29x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- 0.103 -- --
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
41.5% 1.109 29.85% 0.54x
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
52.41% 1.671 93.92% 0.84x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
20.31% 0.674 4.16% 1.23x
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
0.36% 1.345 1.29% 13.42x
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
25.24% 1.045 21.01% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- -- 17.42% 17.42% 100% $71.2M
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$520.1M $153M 10.47% 16.38% 28.92% $298.1M
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$1.7B $405.4M 1.78% 3.36% 17.27% -$55.4M
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$122.9M $49.6M 23.88% 29.77% 35% $74.5M
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
$4.2M $1.5M 1.84% 1.84% 34.48% -$32K
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
-- $248.4M 10.31% 13.92% 6.75% $979.8M

AllianceBernstein Holding LP vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AB or AMG?

    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 54.99%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    98.32% $6.87 $6.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.57, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $339.71 which suggests that it could grow by 16.23%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    5 1 0
  • Is AB or AMG More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.21%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.88%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or AMG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $529M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $290.9M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 4.73x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 12.88x -- $73.8M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    4.73x 17.80x $529M $290.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or BEN?

    Franklin Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 7.59%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    72.9% $0.21 $27.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.57, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Franklin Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.82 which suggests that it could grow by 2.6%. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than Franklin Resources, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    3 4 2
  • Is AB or BEN More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.508%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.88%. Franklin Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays out 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or BEN?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $178.2M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Franklin Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.43x for Franklin Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 12.88x -- $73.8M
    BEN
    Franklin Resources, Inc.
    1.43x 26.58x $2.3B $178.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or CNS?

    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 29.38%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    86.7% $0.81 $719.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.57, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $71.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.36%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    1 0 0
  • Is AB or CNS More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.124%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.88%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or CNS?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.7M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 19.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 5.88x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 12.88x -- $73.8M
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    5.88x 19.85x $141.7M $41.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or GROW?

    U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 35.58%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    99.74% $0.12 $46.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.57, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than U.S. Global Investors, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than U.S. Global Investors, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is AB or GROW More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.036%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.88%. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or GROW?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than U.S. Global Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 2.95x for U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 12.88x -- $73.8M
    GROW
    U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
    2.95x 36.26x $4.2M $1.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AB or PFG?

    Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 6.35%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.79 $1.2B
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    -- $0.95 $16.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $41.57, signalling upside risk potential of 7.03%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.46%. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than Principal Financial Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 6 0
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    1 6 1
  • Is AB or PFG More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.857, which suggesting that the stock is 14.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.653%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.88%. Principal Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc. pays out 42.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or PFG?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.29x for Principal Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    10.83x 12.88x -- $73.8M
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group, Inc.
    1.29x 13.04x $3.7B $233.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock