Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…
Buy
58
AB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.98
Seasonality move
:
0.82%
Day range:
$39.45 - $40.72
52-week range:
$32.28 - $43.30
Dividend yield:
8.73%
P/E ratio:
13.09x
P/S ratio:
10.83x
P/B ratio:
3.08x
Volume:
287.2K
Avg. volume:
231.4K
1-year change:
-1.59%
Market cap:
$3.6B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$3.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
|
$956.1M | $0.92 | 557.02% | 30.94% | $40.86 |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$578.5M | $8.84 | 11.82% | 198.77% | $362.71 |
|
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
$2.2B | $0.55 | 1.75% | 133.06% | $25.73 |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$143.2M | $0.81 | 5.92% | 1.47% | $72.33 |
|
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
|
$4B | $1.75 | 6.7% | 1037.42% | $62.33 |
|
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
|
$39.73 | $40.86 | $3.6B | 13.09x | $0.86 | 8.73% | 10.83x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$329.57 | $362.71 | $9.3B | 20.12x | $0.01 | 0.01% | 5.35x |
|
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
$25.77 | $25.73 | $13.4B | 28.29x | $0.33 | 5.01% | 1.53x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$68.78 | $72.33 | $3.5B | 23.09x | $0.62 | 3.61% | 6.38x |
|
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
|
$46.37 | $62.33 | $13.3B | 36.47x | $0.27 | 2.26% | 1.09x |
|
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
$2.63 | -- | $33.6M | 39.49x | $0.01 | 3.42% | 3.22x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
|
-- | 0.235 | -- | -- |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
41.5% | 1.022 | 29.85% | 0.54x |
|
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
52.41% | 1.425 | 93.92% | 0.84x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
-- | 0.434 | -- | 1.23x |
|
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
|
96.28% | 0.965 | 21.84% | 0.00x |
|
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
0.36% | 1.499 | 1.29% | 13.42x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
|
-- | -- | 17.42% | 17.42% | 100% | $71.2M |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$520.1M | $153M | 10.47% | 16.38% | 28.92% | $298.1M |
|
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
$1.7B | $405.4M | 1.78% | 3.36% | 17.27% | -$55.4M |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$113.4M | $38.1M | 22.73% | 27.14% | 26.89% | $74.5M |
|
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.3B | -4.16% | -8.69% | -74.76% | $278M |
|
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
$4.2M | $1.5M | 1.84% | 1.84% | 34.48% | -$32K |
AllianceBernstein Holding LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AB or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 54.99%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP-- $0.79 $1.2B AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.98.32% $6.87 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About AB or AMG?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $362.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.06%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP1 6 0 AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is AB or AMG More Risky?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.895%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or AMG?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.73%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or AMG?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $529M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $290.9M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.09x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 5.35x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP10.83x 13.09x -- $73.8M AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.5.35x 20.12x $529M $290.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns AB or BEN?
Franklin Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 7.59%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Franklin Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP-- $0.79 $1.2B BENFranklin Resources, Inc.72.9% $0.21 $27.5B -
What do Analysts Say About AB or BEN?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Franklin Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.73 which suggests that it could fall by -0.17%. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than Franklin Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP1 6 0 BENFranklin Resources, Inc.3 4 2 -
Is AB or BEN More Risky?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.264%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or BEN?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.73%. Franklin Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources, Inc. pays out 140.4% of its earnings as a dividend. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or BEN?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is lower than Franklin Resources, Inc.'s net income of $178.2M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.09x while Franklin Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.53x for Franklin Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP10.83x 13.09x -- $73.8M BENFranklin Resources, Inc.1.53x 28.29x $2.3B $178.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns AB or CNS?
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 21.69%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP-- $0.79 $1.2B CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)80.08% $0.68 $562M -
What do Analysts Say About AB or CNS?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.17%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP1 6 0 CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)1 1 0 -
Is AB or CNS More Risky?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or CNS?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.73%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or CNS?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.09x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 23.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 6.38x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP10.83x 13.09x -- $73.8M CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)6.38x 23.09x $141.6M $30.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns AB or EQH?
Equitable Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of -67.39%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat Equitable Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP-- $0.79 $1.2B EQHEquitable Holdings, Inc.-- -$4.47 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About AB or EQH?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Equitable Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $62.33 which suggests that it could grow by 34.43%. Given that Equitable Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe Equitable Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than AllianceBernstein Holding LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP1 6 0 EQHEquitable Holdings, Inc.9 1 0 -
Is AB or EQH More Risky?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equitable Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or EQH?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.73%. Equitable Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Equitable Holdings, Inc. pays out 24.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or EQH?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Equitable Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than Equitable Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.09x while Equitable Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 1.09x for Equitable Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP10.83x 13.09x -- $73.8M EQHEquitable Holdings, Inc.1.09x 36.47x $1.8B -$1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns AB or GROW?
U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a net margin of 89.11% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net margin of 35.58%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 17.42% beat U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP-- $0.79 $1.2B GROWU.S. Global Investors, Inc.99.74% $0.12 $46.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AB or GROW?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Holding LP has higher upside potential than U.S. Global Investors, Inc., analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than U.S. Global Investors, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP1 6 0 GROWU.S. Global Investors, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AB or GROW More Risky?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.038%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AB or GROW?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.73%. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays 80.33% of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AB or GROW?
AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than U.S. Global Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2M. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $73.8M is higher than U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M. Notably, AllianceBernstein Holding LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.09x while U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Holding LP is 10.83x versus 3.22x for U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP10.83x 13.09x -- $73.8M GROWU.S. Global Investors, Inc.3.22x 39.49x $4.2M $1.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Goldman Sachs Going to Go Up?
Shares of financial giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) have soared by…
How High Will MSTR Stock Go?
After several months of pressure, shares of Bitcoin treasury Strategy…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
69
INTC alert for Jan 23
Intel Corp. [INTC] is down 17.01% over the past day.
Buy
70
BNR alert for Jan 23
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 12.81% over the past day.
Buy
80
MTRN alert for Jan 23
Materion Corp. [MTRN] is down 9.13% over the past day.
