EQH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DigitalBridge Group has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Equitable Holdings's net margin of 30.33%. Equitable Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat DigitalBridge Group's return on equity of 4.58%.

Equitable Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand DigitalBridge Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.35 which suggests that it could grow by 82.89%. Given that DigitalBridge Group has higher upside potential than Equitable Holdings, analysts believe DigitalBridge Group is more attractive than Equitable Holdings.

Equitable Holdings has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalBridge Group has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.423%.

Equitable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. DigitalBridge Group offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Equitable Holdings pays 29.23% of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalBridge Group pays out 92.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equitable Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than DigitalBridge Group quarterly revenues of $45.4M. Equitable Holdings's net income of $63M is higher than DigitalBridge Group's net income of $13.8M. Notably, Equitable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while DigitalBridge Group's PE ratio is 29.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equitable Holdings is 1.08x versus 2.65x for DigitalBridge Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Destiny Tech100 has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Equitable Holdings's net margin of --. Equitable Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Destiny Tech100's return on equity of 3.51%.

Equitable Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Destiny Tech100 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Equitable Holdings has higher upside potential than Destiny Tech100, analysts believe Equitable Holdings is more attractive than Destiny Tech100.

Equitable Holdings has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Tech100 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Equitable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Destiny Tech100 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Equitable Holdings pays 29.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Tech100 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Equitable Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equitable Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Destiny Tech100 quarterly revenues of --. Equitable Holdings's net income of $63M is higher than Destiny Tech100's net income of --. Notably, Equitable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Destiny Tech100's PE ratio is 23.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equitable Holdings is 1.08x versus 20.61x for Destiny Tech100. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movement Industries has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Equitable Holdings's net margin of --. Equitable Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Movement Industries's return on equity of --.

Equitable Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Movement Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Equitable Holdings has higher upside potential than Movement Industries, analysts believe Equitable Holdings is more attractive than Movement Industries.

Equitable Holdings has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movement Industries has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.006%.

Equitable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Movement Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Equitable Holdings pays 29.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Movement Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Equitable Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equitable Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Movement Industries quarterly revenues of --. Equitable Holdings's net income of $63M is higher than Movement Industries's net income of --. Notably, Equitable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Movement Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equitable Holdings is 1.08x versus -- for Movement Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Voya Financial has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Equitable Holdings's net margin of 4.93%. Equitable Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Voya Financial's return on equity of 10.98%.

Equitable Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 24.43%. On the other hand Voya Financial has an analysts' consensus of $74.18 which suggests that it could grow by 22.33%. Given that Equitable Holdings has higher upside potential than Voya Financial, analysts believe Equitable Holdings is more attractive than Voya Financial.

Equitable Holdings has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Voya Financial has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.862%.

Equitable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Voya Financial offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equitable Holdings pays 29.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Voya Financial pays out 31.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equitable Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Voya Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Equitable Holdings's net income of $63M is lower than Voya Financial's net income of $97M. Notably, Equitable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Voya Financial's PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equitable Holdings is 1.08x versus 0.78x for Voya Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.