CSIOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comture Corp. has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 7.86%. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.66% beat Comture Corp.'s return on equity of 17.19%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comture Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Comture Corp., analysts believe Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Comture Corp..

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comture Corp. has a beta of -0.095, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.499%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comture Corp. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. pays 108.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Comture Corp. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Comture Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s is not.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $489.1M, which are larger than Comture Corp. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net income of $47.8M is higher than Comture Corp.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Comture Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is 1.24x versus 1.88x for Comture Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fujitsu Ltd. has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 9.32%. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.66% beat Fujitsu Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fujitsu Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fujitsu Ltd., analysts believe Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Fujitsu Ltd..

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fujitsu Ltd. has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.827%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fujitsu Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. pays 108.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd. pays out 15.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s is not.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $489.1M, which are smaller than Fujitsu Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net income of $47.8M is lower than Fujitsu Ltd.'s net income of $535.1M. Notably, Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Fujitsu Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is 1.24x versus 2.02x for Fujitsu Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 14.51%. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.66% beat Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.24%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nomura Research Institute Ltd., analysts believe Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Nomura Research Institute Ltd..

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.738%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. pays 108.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. pays out 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s is not.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $489.1M, which are smaller than Nomura Research Institute Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net income of $47.8M is lower than Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s net income of $193.4M. Notably, Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is 1.24x versus 2.88x for Nomura Research Institute Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

transcosmos, Inc. has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 4.08%. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.66% beat transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand transcosmos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than transcosmos, Inc., analysts believe Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is more attractive than transcosmos, Inc..

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.676%.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. transcosmos, Inc. offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. pays 108.5% of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc. pays out 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s is not.

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $489.1M, which are smaller than transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $654.2M. Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s net income of $47.8M is higher than transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M. Notably, Casio Computer Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while transcosmos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casio Computer Co., Ltd. is 1.24x versus 0.31x for transcosmos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.