Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
45
CRWOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.4971
Seasonality move
:
3.05%
Day range:
$0.4971 - $0.4971
52-week range:
$0.3978 - $0.5698
Dividend yield:
7.32%
P/E ratio:
4.03x
P/S ratio:
0.08x
P/B ratio:
0.28x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
558
1-year change:
-0.58%
Market cap:
$12.3B
Revenue:
$161B
EPS (TTM):
$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRWOF
China Railway Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$39.3M | -- | 154.52% | -- | $1.50 |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRWOF
China Railway Group Ltd.
|
$0.4971 | -- | $12.3B | 4.03x | $0.01 | 7.32% | 0.08x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.13 | -- | $5.8M | 0.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$1.05 | -- | $4.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.04x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$0.39 | -- | $4.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.67x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$0.85 | $1.50 | $75.7M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.47x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
$1.18 | -- | $5.7M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRWOF
China Railway Group Ltd.
|
68.92% | 0.164 | 285.45% | 0.65x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
26.7% | 0.691 | 18.7% | 2.59x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-3.29% | -3.023 | 1.23% | 0.14x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
2.43% | 0.097 | 5.49% | 16.39x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 1.914 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
1.33% | -0.291 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRWOF
China Railway Group Ltd.
|
$3.3B | $1.4B | 2.31% | 5.6% | 3.77% | -$535M |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -15.63% | -28.71% | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$274.1K | -$755.1K | -211.34% | -263.14% | -80.65% | -$73.4K |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$225.1K | -$449.8K | -10.36% | -18.03% | -54.81% | -$700K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
China Railway Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CRWOF or AEHL?
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 2.31% compared to China Railway Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Railway Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.6% beat Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.9.06% $0.03 $165.1B AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.-- -- $24.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CRWOF or AEHL?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Railway Group Ltd. is more attractive than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0 0 0 AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRWOF or AEHL More Risky?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.033%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRWOF or AEHL?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.32%. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Group Ltd. pays 16.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRWOF or AEHL?
China Railway Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $36.8B, which are larger than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Railway Group Ltd.'s net income of $849M is higher than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Railway Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Group Ltd. is 0.08x versus 0.05x for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0.08x 4.03x $36.8B $849M AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0.05x 0.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRWOF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 2.31% compared to China Railway Group Ltd.'s net margin of -77.29%. China Railway Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.6% beat Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.9.06% $0.03 $165.1B AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.29.28% -$0.43 $9.9K -
What do Analysts Say About CRWOF or AIHS?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Railway Group Ltd. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRWOF or AIHS More Risky?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRWOF or AIHS?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.32%. Senmiao Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Group Ltd. pays 16.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRWOF or AIHS?
China Railway Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $36.8B, which are larger than Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of $936.3K. China Railway Group Ltd.'s net income of $849M is higher than Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K. Notably, China Railway Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Group Ltd. is 0.08x versus 1.04x for Senmiao Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0.08x 4.03x $36.8B $849M AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.1.04x -- $936.3K -$723.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRWOF or ATXG?
Addentax Group Corp. has a net margin of 2.31% compared to China Railway Group Ltd.'s net margin of -101.37%. China Railway Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.6% beat Addentax Group Corp.'s return on equity of -18.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.9.06% $0.03 $165.1B ATXGAddentax Group Corp.27.43% -$0.01 $26.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CRWOF or ATXG?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Addentax Group Corp., analysts believe China Railway Group Ltd. is more attractive than Addentax Group Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CRWOF or ATXG More Risky?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRWOF or ATXG?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.32%. Addentax Group Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Group Ltd. pays 16.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRWOF or ATXG?
China Railway Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $36.8B, which are larger than Addentax Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $820.7K. China Railway Group Ltd.'s net income of $849M is higher than Addentax Group Corp.'s net income of -$831.9K. Notably, China Railway Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Addentax Group Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Group Ltd. is 0.08x versus 0.67x for Addentax Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0.08x 4.03x $36.8B $849M ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0.67x -- $820.7K -$831.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRWOF or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 2.31% compared to China Railway Group Ltd.'s net margin of 3.42%. China Railway Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.6% beat CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.9.06% $0.03 $165.1B CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CRWOF or CBAT?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 75.64%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Railway Group Ltd., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China Railway Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRWOF or CBAT More Risky?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRWOF or CBAT?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.32%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Group Ltd. pays 16.57% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRWOF or CBAT?
China Railway Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $36.8B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. China Railway Group Ltd.'s net income of $849M is higher than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, China Railway Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5,082.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Group Ltd. is 0.08x versus 0.47x for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0.08x 4.03x $36.8B $849M CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.47x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRWOF or NISN?
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 2.31% compared to China Railway Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Railway Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.6% beat Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.9.06% $0.03 $165.1B NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CRWOF or NISN?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7611.86%. Given that Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Railway Group Ltd., analysts believe Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Railway Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0 0 0 NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRWOF or NISN More Risky?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRWOF or NISN?
China Railway Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.32%. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Group Ltd. pays 16.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRWOF or NISN?
China Railway Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $36.8B, which are larger than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Railway Group Ltd.'s net income of $849M is higher than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Railway Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Group Ltd. is 0.08x versus 0.01x for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRWOFChina Railway Group Ltd.0.08x 4.03x $36.8B $849M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0.01x 2.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
