CRECF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enertopia has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of 5.06% beat Enertopia's return on equity of --.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enertopia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than Critical Elements Lithium Corp., analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than Critical Elements Lithium Corp..

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.198, which suggesting that the stock is 119.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.482%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enertopia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Elements Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enertopia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Enertopia quarterly revenues of --. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net income of $821.9K is higher than Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K. Notably, Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.25x while Enertopia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Elements Lithium Corp. is -- versus 21,678.81x for Enertopia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of 5.06% beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Critical Elements Lithium Corp. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.198, which suggesting that the stock is 119.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Elements Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net income of $821.9K is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.25x while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Elements Lithium Corp. is -- versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net margin of -27.31%. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of 5.06% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 21.31%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Critical Elements Lithium Corp., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Critical Elements Lithium Corp..

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.198, which suggesting that the stock is 119.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Critical Elements Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net income of $821.9K is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.25x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Elements Lithium Corp. is -- versus 49.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net margin of -1367.86%. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of 5.06% beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 350.5%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Critical Elements Lithium Corp., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Critical Elements Lithium Corp..

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.198, which suggesting that the stock is 119.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.14%.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Elements Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s net income of $821.9K is higher than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Critical Elements Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.25x while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Elements Lithium Corp. is -- versus 4.33x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.