CFRHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net margin of -6.75%. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's return on equity of 12.76% beat Aptiv Plc's return on equity of 3.28%.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aptiv Plc has an analysts' consensus of $99.65 which suggests that it could grow by 30.51%. Given that Aptiv Plc has higher upside potential than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA, analysts believe Aptiv Plc is more attractive than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv Plc has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.357%.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Aptiv Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA pays 67.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aptiv Plc quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than Aptiv Plc's net income of -$352M. Notably, Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Aptiv Plc's PE ratio is 60.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is 5.14x versus 0.85x for Aptiv Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Garrett Motion, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net margin of 8.54%. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's return on equity of 12.76% beat Garrett Motion, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Garrett Motion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.01%. Given that Garrett Motion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA, analysts believe Garrett Motion, Inc. is more attractive than Compagnie Financière Richemont SA.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garrett Motion, Inc. has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.297%.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Garrett Motion, Inc. offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA pays 67.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion, Inc. pays out 4.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Garrett Motion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $902M. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than Garrett Motion, Inc.'s net income of $77M. Notably, Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while Garrett Motion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is 5.14x versus 0.97x for Garrett Motion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Swatch Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net margin of --. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's return on equity of 12.76% beat The Swatch Group AG's return on equity of 0.49%.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Swatch Group AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has higher upside potential than The Swatch Group AG, analysts believe Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is more attractive than The Swatch Group AG.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Swatch Group AG has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.359%.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. The Swatch Group AG offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA pays 67.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Swatch Group AG pays out 57.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Swatch Group AG quarterly revenues of --. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than The Swatch Group AG's net income of --. Notably, Compagnie Financière Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.56x while The Swatch Group AG's PE ratio is 151.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financière Richemont SA is 5.14x versus 1.42x for The Swatch Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.