CBULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enertopia has a net margin of -- compared to Gratomic, Inc.'s net margin of --. Gratomic, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Enertopia's return on equity of --.

Gratomic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enertopia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Enertopia has higher upside potential than Gratomic, Inc., analysts believe Enertopia is more attractive than Gratomic, Inc..

Gratomic, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enertopia has a beta of -0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.482%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enertopia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gratomic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enertopia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gratomic, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enertopia quarterly revenues of --. Gratomic, Inc.'s net income of -$338.3K is lower than Enertopia's net income of -$153.7K. Notably, Gratomic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enertopia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gratomic, Inc. is 24,804.23x versus 21,678.81x for Enertopia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -- compared to Gratomic, Inc.'s net margin of --. Gratomic, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Gratomic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gratomic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Gratomic, Inc. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Gratomic, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gratomic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gratomic, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Gratomic, Inc.'s net income of -$338.3K is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Gratomic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gratomic, Inc. is 24,804.23x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gratomic, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Gratomic, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.61%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Gratomic, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Gratomic, Inc..

Gratomic, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Gratomic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gratomic, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Gratomic, Inc.'s net income of -$338.3K is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Gratomic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gratomic, Inc. is 24,804.23x versus 50.10x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Gratomic, Inc.'s net margin of -1367.86%. Gratomic, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 317.43%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gratomic, Inc., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Gratomic, Inc..

Gratomic, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.14%.

Gratomic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gratomic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gratomic, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Gratomic, Inc.'s net income of -$338.3K is higher than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Gratomic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gratomic, Inc. is 24,804.23x versus 4.68x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.