CAJFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fujitsu Ltd. has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Canon, Inc.'s net margin of 9.32%. Canon, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.13% beat Fujitsu Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

Canon, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fujitsu Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canon, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fujitsu Ltd., analysts believe Canon, Inc. is more attractive than Fujitsu Ltd..

Canon, Inc. has a beta of -0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 105.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fujitsu Ltd. has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.827%.

Canon, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Fujitsu Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Canon, Inc. pays 43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd. pays out 15.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canon, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Fujitsu Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Canon, Inc.'s net income of $785.1M is higher than Fujitsu Ltd.'s net income of $535.1M. Notably, Canon, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Fujitsu Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canon, Inc. is 1.00x versus 2.02x for Fujitsu Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Canon, Inc.'s net margin of 14.51%. Canon, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.13% beat Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.24%.

Canon, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canon, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nomura Research Institute Ltd., analysts believe Canon, Inc. is more attractive than Nomura Research Institute Ltd..

Canon, Inc. has a beta of -0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 105.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.738%.

Canon, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Canon, Inc. pays 43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. pays out 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canon, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Nomura Research Institute Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Canon, Inc.'s net income of $785.1M is higher than Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s net income of $193.4M. Notably, Canon, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canon, Inc. is 1.00x versus 2.88x for Nomura Research Institute Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

transcosmos, Inc. has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Canon, Inc.'s net margin of 4.08%. Canon, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.13% beat transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87%.

Canon, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand transcosmos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canon, Inc. has higher upside potential than transcosmos, Inc., analysts believe Canon, Inc. is more attractive than transcosmos, Inc..

Canon, Inc. has a beta of -0.055, which suggesting that the stock is 105.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.676%.

Canon, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. transcosmos, Inc. offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Canon, Inc. pays 43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc. pays out 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canon, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $654.2M. Canon, Inc.'s net income of $785.1M is higher than transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M. Notably, Canon, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while transcosmos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canon, Inc. is 1.00x versus 0.31x for transcosmos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.