Financhill
Sell
46

BLHWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1,078.00
Seasonality move :
7.18%
Day range:
$1,078.00 - $1,078.00
52-week range:
$654.84 - $1,174.91
Dividend yield:
1%
P/E ratio:
67.24x
P/S ratio:
11.14x
P/B ratio:
21.27x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
24
1-year change:
52.05%
Market cap:
$13.3B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$16.04

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BLHWF
BELIMO Holding AG
-- -- -- -- --
ABBNY
ABB Ltd.
$8.9B $0.70 5.13% 38.91% $67.00
AEBI
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
$488.1M $0.13 115.91% -33.45% $15.75
KHNGY
Kühne + Nagel International AG
-- -- -- -- --
SGSOY
SGS SA
-- -- -- -- --
SHLAF
Schindler Holding AG
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BLHWF
BELIMO Holding AG
$1,078.00 -- $13.3B 67.24x $10.74 1% 11.14x
ABBNY
ABB Ltd.
$72.87 $67.00 $132.5B 30.01x $1.03 1.41% 3.88x
AEBI
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
$12.62 $15.75 $979.3M 29.53x $0.03 0% 0.59x
KHNGY
Kühne + Nagel International AG
$40.69 -- $24.2B 20.09x $1.96 4.82% 0.81x
SGSOY
SGS SA
$11.22 -- $20.7B 29.42x $0.39 3.44% 2.69x
SHLAF
Schindler Holding AG
$359.16 -- $38.6B 33.95x $6.81 1.9% 3.01x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BLHWF
BELIMO Holding AG
-- 0.909 -- 1.36x
ABBNY
ABB Ltd.
38.55% 1.114 7.14% 0.94x
AEBI
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
50.05% 0.000 84.1% 0.97x
KHNGY
Kühne + Nagel International AG
61% -0.181 18.35% 0.79x
SGSOY
SGS SA
-- 0.241 -- --
SHLAF
Schindler Holding AG
4.1% -0.605 -- 1.18x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BLHWF
BELIMO Holding AG
-- -- 32% 32% -- --
ABBNY
ABB Ltd.
$3.7B $1.6B 19.4% 30.73% 17.99% $1.6B
AEBI
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
$86.1M $32.4M 0.46% 1.02% 6.87% -$9.2M
KHNGY
Kühne + Nagel International AG
$808.5M $346.1M 19.52% 40.69% 4.58% $488.2M
SGSOY
SGS SA
-- -- -- -- -- --
SHLAF
Schindler Holding AG
-- $418.7M 20.7% 21.19% 12.56% $198.4M

BELIMO Holding AG vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BLHWF or ABBNY?

    ABB Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BELIMO Holding AG's net margin of 13.62%. BELIMO Holding AG's return on equity of 32% beat ABB Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    -- -- $679.5M
    ABBNY
    ABB Ltd.
    40.38% $0.66 $24.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLHWF or ABBNY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $67.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.06%. Given that ABB Ltd. has higher upside potential than BELIMO Holding AG, analysts believe ABB Ltd. is more attractive than BELIMO Holding AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    0 0 0
    ABBNY
    ABB Ltd.
    0 3 0
  • Is BLHWF or ABBNY More Risky?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a beta of -1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 215.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABB Ltd. has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.535%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLHWF or ABBNY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $10.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. ABB Ltd. offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. BELIMO Holding AG pays 79.6% of its earnings as a dividend. ABB Ltd. pays out 28.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLHWF or ABBNY?

    BELIMO Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ABB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9B. BELIMO Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than ABB Ltd.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, BELIMO Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.24x while ABB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 30.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BELIMO Holding AG is 11.14x versus 3.88x for ABB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    11.14x 67.24x -- --
    ABBNY
    ABB Ltd.
    3.88x 30.01x $9B $1.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns BLHWF or AEBI?

    Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to BELIMO Holding AG's net margin of 0.25%. BELIMO Holding AG's return on equity of 32% beat Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's return on equity of 1.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    -- -- $679.5M
    AEBI
    Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
    18.28% $0.02 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLHWF or AEBI?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 24.8%. Given that Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has higher upside potential than BELIMO Holding AG, analysts believe Aebi Schmidt Holding AG is more attractive than BELIMO Holding AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    0 0 0
    AEBI
    Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
    2 1 0
  • Is BLHWF or AEBI More Risky?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a beta of -1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 215.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLHWF or AEBI?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $10.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. BELIMO Holding AG pays 79.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG pays out -10.49% of its earnings as a dividend. BELIMO Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLHWF or AEBI?

    BELIMO Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG quarterly revenues of $471.3M. BELIMO Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's net income of $1.2M. Notably, BELIMO Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.24x while Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's PE ratio is 29.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BELIMO Holding AG is 11.14x versus 0.59x for Aebi Schmidt Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    11.14x 67.24x -- --
    AEBI
    Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
    0.59x 29.53x $471.3M $1.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns BLHWF or KHNGY?

    Kühne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to BELIMO Holding AG's net margin of 3.41%. BELIMO Holding AG's return on equity of 32% beat Kühne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 40.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    -- -- $679.5M
    KHNGY
    Kühne + Nagel International AG
    10.71% $0.42 $6.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLHWF or KHNGY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kühne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BELIMO Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kühne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe BELIMO Holding AG is more attractive than Kühne + Nagel International AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    0 0 0
    KHNGY
    Kühne + Nagel International AG
    0 0 0
  • Is BLHWF or KHNGY More Risky?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a beta of -1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 215.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kühne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.095%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLHWF or KHNGY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $10.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Kühne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.96 per share. BELIMO Holding AG pays 79.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Kühne + Nagel International AG pays out 53.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLHWF or KHNGY?

    BELIMO Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kühne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.6B. BELIMO Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Kühne + Nagel International AG's net income of $257.4M. Notably, BELIMO Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.24x while Kühne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BELIMO Holding AG is 11.14x versus 0.81x for Kühne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    11.14x 67.24x -- --
    KHNGY
    Kühne + Nagel International AG
    0.81x 20.09x $7.6B $257.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns BLHWF or SGSOY?

    SGS SA has a net margin of -- compared to BELIMO Holding AG's net margin of --. BELIMO Holding AG's return on equity of 32% beat SGS SA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    -- -- $679.5M
    SGSOY
    SGS SA
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About BLHWF or SGSOY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BELIMO Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS SA, analysts believe BELIMO Holding AG is more attractive than SGS SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    0 0 0
    SGSOY
    SGS SA
    0 0 0
  • Is BLHWF or SGSOY More Risky?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a beta of -1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 215.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS SA has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.525%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLHWF or SGSOY?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $10.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. SGS SA offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. BELIMO Holding AG pays 79.6% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS SA pays out 47.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLHWF or SGSOY?

    BELIMO Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGS SA quarterly revenues of --. BELIMO Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than SGS SA's net income of --. Notably, BELIMO Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.24x while SGS SA's PE ratio is 29.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BELIMO Holding AG is 11.14x versus 2.69x for SGS SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    11.14x 67.24x -- --
    SGSOY
    SGS SA
    2.69x 29.42x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BLHWF or SHLAF?

    Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to BELIMO Holding AG's net margin of 8.89%. BELIMO Holding AG's return on equity of 32% beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    -- -- $679.5M
    SHLAF
    Schindler Holding AG
    -- $2.76 $6.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BLHWF or SHLAF?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BELIMO Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe BELIMO Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    0 0 0
    SHLAF
    Schindler Holding AG
    0 0 0
  • Is BLHWF or SHLAF More Risky?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a beta of -1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 215.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.798%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLHWF or SHLAF?

    BELIMO Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $10.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share. BELIMO Holding AG pays 79.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BLHWF or SHLAF?

    BELIMO Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.3B. BELIMO Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M. Notably, BELIMO Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.24x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BELIMO Holding AG is 11.14x versus 3.01x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BLHWF
    BELIMO Holding AG
    11.14x 67.24x -- --
    SHLAF
    Schindler Holding AG
    3.01x 33.95x $3.3B $296.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8

Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 28.81% over the past day.

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 43.66% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock