SHLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 0.25%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19% beat Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's return on equity of 1.02%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe Aebi Schmidt Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG pays out -10.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG quarterly revenues of $471.3M. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M is higher than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's PE ratio is 30.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 3.01x versus 0.62x for Aebi Schmidt Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geberit AG has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.708%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 45.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M is higher than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 38.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 3.01x versus 7.27x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kühne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 3.41%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19% beat Kühne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 40.69%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kühne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kühne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Kühne + Nagel International AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kühne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.095%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Kühne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.96 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kühne + Nagel International AG pays out 53.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Kühne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M is higher than Kühne + Nagel International AG's net income of $257.4M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while Kühne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 21.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 3.01x versus 0.87x for Kühne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGS SA has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19% beat SGS SA's return on equity of --.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS SA, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than SGS SA.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.798% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS SA has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.525%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. SGS SA offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS SA pays out 47.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than SGS SA quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M is higher than SGS SA's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while SGS SA's PE ratio is 30.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 3.01x versus 2.74x for SGS SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.