SGSOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of --. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.205%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 70.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 32.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 6.31x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 4.38%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 38.1%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.111%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 100.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.7B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $337M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 0.95x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of --. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's return on equity of 5.96%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon pays out 98.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon quarterly revenues of --. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's net income of --. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 0.45x for OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 9.18%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.141%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.3B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.06x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 30.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.77x versus 2.71x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.