BKFKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Bakkafrost P/F's net margin of -410.37%. Bakkafrost P/F's return on equity of 3.63% beat Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amaze Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4643.59%. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bakkafrost P/F, analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bakkafrost P/F.

Bakkafrost P/F has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Amaze Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkafrost P/F pays 79.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bakkafrost P/F's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bakkafrost P/F quarterly revenues are $261.3M, which are larger than Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Bakkafrost P/F's net income of $12M is higher than Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Bakkafrost P/F's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.51x while Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkafrost P/F is 2.70x versus 0.40x for Amaze Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DDC Enterprise Ltd. has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Bakkafrost P/F's net margin of --. Bakkafrost P/F's return on equity of 3.63% beat DDC Enterprise Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Bakkafrost P/F has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DDC Enterprise Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 811.85%. Given that DDC Enterprise Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bakkafrost P/F, analysts believe DDC Enterprise Ltd. is more attractive than Bakkafrost P/F.

Bakkafrost P/F has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DDC Enterprise Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. DDC Enterprise Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkafrost P/F pays 79.65% of its earnings as a dividend. DDC Enterprise Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bakkafrost P/F's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bakkafrost P/F quarterly revenues are $261.3M, which are larger than DDC Enterprise Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bakkafrost P/F's net income of $12M is higher than DDC Enterprise Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bakkafrost P/F's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.51x while DDC Enterprise Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkafrost P/F is 2.70x versus 2.31x for DDC Enterprise Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Bakkafrost P/F's net margin of -7.56%. Bakkafrost P/F's return on equity of 3.63% beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 307.88%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bakkafrost P/F, analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Bakkafrost P/F.

Bakkafrost P/F has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkafrost P/F pays 79.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bakkafrost P/F's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bakkafrost P/F quarterly revenues are $261.3M, which are larger than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Bakkafrost P/F's net income of $12M is higher than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, Bakkafrost P/F's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.51x while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkafrost P/F is 2.70x versus 0.51x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Bakkafrost P/F's net margin of -480.68%. Bakkafrost P/F's return on equity of 3.63% beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Bakkafrost P/F has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2566.67%. Given that Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bakkafrost P/F, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group, Inc. is more attractive than Bakkafrost P/F.

Bakkafrost P/F has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

Bakkafrost P/F has a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bakkafrost P/F pays 79.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bakkafrost P/F's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bakkafrost P/F quarterly revenues are $261.3M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Bakkafrost P/F's net income of $12M is higher than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Bakkafrost P/F's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.51x while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bakkafrost P/F is 2.70x versus 2.70x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.