AMZE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 12.96%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.56%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $86.55 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.856%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $663M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 16.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.83x versus 1.92x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ExlService Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 13.29%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat ExlService Holdings's return on equity of 23.98%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ExlService Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $54.35 which suggests that it could grow by 16.45%. Given that ExlService Holdings has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe ExlService Holdings is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.469%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ExlService Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ExlService Holdings quarterly revenues of $501M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than ExlService Holdings's net income of $66.6M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ExlService Holdings's PE ratio is 35.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.83x versus 4.02x for ExlService Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.38%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.83x versus 10.23x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hackett Group has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 4.5%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat The Hackett Group's return on equity of 28.92%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Hackett Group has an analysts' consensus of $35.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.13%. Given that The Hackett Group has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe The Hackett Group is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hackett Group has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.778%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hackett Group offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group pays out 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Hackett Group quarterly revenues of $79.2M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than The Hackett Group's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hackett Group's PE ratio is 24.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 25.83x versus 2.33x for The Hackett Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.