AMZE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MGP Ingredients, Inc. has a net margin of -410.37% compared to Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 11.64%. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72% beat MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.77%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4679.13%. On the other hand MGP Ingredients, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.20 which suggests that it could grow by 46.56%. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than MGP Ingredients, Inc., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than MGP Ingredients, Inc..

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGP Ingredients, Inc. has a beta of 0.391, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.854%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MGP Ingredients, Inc. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGP Ingredients, Inc. pays out 30.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than MGP Ingredients, Inc. quarterly revenues of $130.9M. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M. Notably, Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.92x for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rooshine, Inc. has a net margin of -410.37% compared to Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72% beat Rooshine, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4679.13%. On the other hand Rooshine, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rooshine, Inc., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Rooshine, Inc..

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rooshine, Inc. has a beta of 0.211, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.883%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rooshine, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rooshine, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are larger than Rooshine, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is higher than Rooshine, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rooshine, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus -- for Rooshine, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of -410.37% compared to Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -480.68%. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72% beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4679.13%. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2930.3%. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Splash Beverage Group, Inc., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Splash Beverage Group, Inc..

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is higher than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 2.38x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has a net margin of -410.37% compared to Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -13.08%. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72% beat Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.79%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4679.13%. On the other hand Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc..

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has a beta of 0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.624%.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. pays out 765.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.38x for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.