AMZE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 10.74%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.12%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $88.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.79%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.986%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $546M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 17.25x versus 1.91x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ExlService Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 10.53%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat ExlService Holdings's return on equity of 22.62%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ExlService Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that ExlService Holdings has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe ExlService Holdings is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.628%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ExlService Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ExlService Holdings quarterly revenues of $481.4M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than ExlService Holdings's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ExlService Holdings's PE ratio is 38.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 17.25x versus 4.18x for ExlService Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.52%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 13.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 17.25x versus 12.39x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Amaze Holdings's net margin of --. Amaze Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Amaze Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.06%. Given that Marti Technologies has higher upside potential than Amaze Holdings, analysts believe Marti Technologies is more attractive than Amaze Holdings.

Amaze Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amaze Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amaze Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amaze Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Amaze Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Amaze Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amaze Holdings is 17.25x versus 9.39x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.