Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
59
BACHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.59
Seasonality move
:
8.08%
Day range:
$0.59 - $0.59
52-week range:
$0.50 - $0.64
Dividend yield:
8.4%
P/E ratio:
7.12x
P/S ratio:
0.99x
P/B ratio:
0.51x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
21.1K
1-year change:
4.48%
Market cap:
$188.5B
Revenue:
$173.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BACHF
Bank of China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BACHF
Bank of China Ltd.
|
$0.59 | -- | $188.5B | 7.12x | $0.02 | 8.4% | 0.99x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$5.22 | -- | $22.9B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 8.82% | 0.59x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0098 | -- | $312.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$6.09 | -- | $25.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.84x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$12.05 | $14.14 | $797.2M | 9.21x | $1.16 | 9.6% | 2.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BACHF
Bank of China Ltd.
|
73.82% | 0.274 | 492.83% | 0.00x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 113.926 | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BACHF
Bank of China Ltd.
|
-- | $10.1B | 2.51% | 9.14% | 68.08% | -$10.9B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
Bank of China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BACHF or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.65% compared to Bank of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BACHFBank of China Ltd.-- $0.03 $1.5T CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BACHF or CCGDF?
Bank of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Bank of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BACHFBank of China Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BACHF or CCGDF More Risky?
Bank of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.106, which suggesting that the stock is 89.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BACHF or CCGDF?
Bank of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of China Ltd. pays 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BACHF or CCGDF?
Bank of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $42.9B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s net income of $8.9B is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bank of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of China Ltd. is 0.99x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BACHFBank of China Ltd.0.99x 7.12x $42.9B $8.9B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BACHF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.65% compared to Bank of China Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. Bank of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BACHFBank of China Ltd.-- $0.03 $1.5T CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About BACHF or CMAKY?
Bank of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe Bank of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BACHFBank of China Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BACHF or CMAKY More Risky?
Bank of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.106, which suggesting that the stock is 89.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BACHF or CMAKY?
Bank of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 8.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Bank of China Ltd. pays 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BACHF or CMAKY?
Bank of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $42.9B, which are larger than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Bank of China Ltd.'s net income of $8.9B is higher than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Bank of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of China Ltd. is 0.99x versus 0.59x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BACHFBank of China Ltd.0.99x 7.12x $42.9B $8.9B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.59x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns BACHF or JPPYY?
Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 20.65% compared to Bank of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BACHFBank of China Ltd.-- $0.03 $1.5T JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BACHF or JPPYY?
Bank of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Bank of China Ltd. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BACHFBank of China Ltd.0 0 0 JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BACHF or JPPYY More Risky?
Bank of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.106, which suggesting that the stock is 89.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 13.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1251.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BACHF or JPPYY?
Bank of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of China Ltd. pays 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BACHF or JPPYY?
Bank of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $42.9B, which are larger than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s net income of $8.9B is higher than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bank of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of China Ltd. is 0.99x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BACHFBank of China Ltd.0.99x 7.12x $42.9B $8.9B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BACHF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 20.65% compared to Bank of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BACHFBank of China Ltd.-- $0.03 $1.5T MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BACHF or MAAS?
Bank of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Bank of China Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BACHFBank of China Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BACHF or MAAS More Risky?
Bank of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.106, which suggesting that the stock is 89.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BACHF or MAAS?
Bank of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of China Ltd. pays 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BACHF or MAAS?
Bank of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $42.9B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Bank of China Ltd.'s net income of $8.9B is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Bank of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of China Ltd. is 0.99x versus 2.84x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BACHFBank of China Ltd.0.99x 7.12x $42.9B $8.9B MAASMaase, Inc.2.84x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BACHF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 20.65% compared to Bank of China Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. Bank of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BACHFBank of China Ltd.-- $0.03 $1.5T NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About BACHF or NOAH?
Bank of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bank of China Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Bank of China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BACHFBank of China Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is BACHF or NOAH More Risky?
Bank of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.106, which suggesting that the stock is 89.413% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BACHF or NOAH?
Bank of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Bank of China Ltd. pays 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BACHF or NOAH?
Bank of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $42.9B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. Bank of China Ltd.'s net income of $8.9B is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, Bank of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of China Ltd. is 0.99x versus 2.37x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BACHFBank of China Ltd.0.99x 7.12x $42.9B $8.9B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.37x 9.21x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
