AUOTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Foxconn Technology has a net margin of 2.36% compared to AUO's net margin of 2.71%. AUO's return on equity of -1.97% beat Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.31%.

AUO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand Foxconn Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AUO has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe AUO is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

AUO has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AUO has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Foxconn Technology offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AUO pays -225.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AUO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. AUO's net income of $50.1M is higher than Foxconn Technology's net income of $27.9M. Notably, AUO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foxconn Technology's PE ratio is 22.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AUO is 0.45x versus 1.06x for Foxconn Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MediaTek has a net margin of 2.36% compared to AUO's net margin of 17.23%. AUO's return on equity of -1.97% beat MediaTek's return on equity of 26.95%.

AUO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand MediaTek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AUO has higher upside potential than MediaTek, analysts believe AUO is more attractive than MediaTek.

AUO has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MediaTek has a beta of -0.077, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.67%.

AUO has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. MediaTek offers a yield of 12.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. AUO pays -225.22% of its earnings as a dividend. MediaTek pays out 82.3% of its earnings as a dividend. MediaTek's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AUO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than MediaTek quarterly revenues of $4.3B. AUO's net income of $50.1M is lower than MediaTek's net income of $735.7M. Notably, AUO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MediaTek's PE ratio is 3.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AUO is 0.45x versus 0.70x for MediaTek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a net margin of 2.36% compared to AUO's net margin of 43.14%. AUO's return on equity of -1.97% beat Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's return on equity of 30.23%.

AUO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $242.93 which suggests that it could grow by 53.03%. Given that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has higher upside potential than AUO, analysts believe Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is more attractive than AUO.

AUO has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.296%.

AUO has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. AUO pays -225.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing pays out 30.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AUO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $26.9B. AUO's net income of $50.1M is lower than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net income of $11.6B. Notably, AUO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's PE ratio is 22.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AUO is 0.45x versus 9.14x for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 2.36% compared to AUO's net margin of 14.07%. AUO's return on equity of -1.97% beat United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.88%.

AUO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand United Microelectronics has an analysts' consensus of $6.98 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that AUO has higher upside potential than United Microelectronics, analysts believe AUO is more attractive than United Microelectronics.

AUO has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.815% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.582%.

AUO has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.5%. United Microelectronics offers a yield of 6.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. AUO pays -225.22% of its earnings as a dividend. United Microelectronics pays out 79.61% of its earnings as a dividend. United Microelectronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AUO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than United Microelectronics quarterly revenues of $1.9B. AUO's net income of $50.1M is lower than United Microelectronics's net income of $262.8M. Notably, AUO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United Microelectronics's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AUO is 0.45x versus 2.36x for United Microelectronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.