LEDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of -24.11% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of -12.42%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88% beat AXT's return on equity of -3.81%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 138.53%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.027%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $23.6M. SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K is higher than AXT's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 1.54x versus 0.99x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of -24.11% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of 9.61%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88% beat Entegris's return on equity of 6.6%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.82%. Given that Entegris has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe Entegris is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.523%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 33.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $807.7M. SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K is lower than Entegris's net income of $77.6M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 65.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 1.54x versus 4.71x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of -24.11% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of 9.01%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 24.9%. Given that FormFactor has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe FormFactor is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.61%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K is lower than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 24.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 1.54x versus 4.54x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -24.11% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of 1.64%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.74%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.712%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 34.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 1.54x versus 0.77x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.