Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
36
ASMMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.43
Seasonality move
:
-5.22%
Day range:
$0.39 - $0.45
52-week range:
$0.23 - $2.05
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
37.89x
P/B ratio:
0.58x
Volume:
43.7K
Avg. volume:
49.8K
1-year change:
45.63%
Market cap:
$114.3M
Revenue:
$2.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASMMF
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARAFF
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $10.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASMMF
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.
|
$0.43 | -- | $114.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 37.89x |
|
ARAFF
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.
|
$0.17 | -- | $481.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 354.77x |
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
$3.59 | -- | $1.5B | 12.64x | $0.02 | 0% | 2.15x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
$4.45 | -- | $262.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
$6.70 | $10.00 | $44.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASMMF
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.
|
8.06% | 0.846 | -- | 1.16x |
|
ARAFF
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.
|
-- | -0.387 | -- | -- |
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
9.6% | 1.136 | -- | 1.35x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | 1.380 | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | 1.023 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASMMF
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -13.96% | -15.13% | -- | -- |
|
ARAFF
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.43% | 10.19% | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ASMMF or ARAFF?
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s return on equity of -15.13% beat Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.-- -- $129.4M ARAFFArafura Rare Earths Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASMMF or ARAFF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has higher upside potential than Arafura Rare Earths Ltd., analysts believe Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is more attractive than Arafura Rare Earths Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.0 0 0 ARAFFArafura Rare Earths Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASMMF or ARAFF More Risky?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.175%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASMMF or ARAFF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASMMF or ARAFF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is 37.89x versus 354.77x for Arafura Rare Earths Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.37.89x -- -- -- ARAFFArafura Rare Earths Ltd.354.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASMMF or ILKAF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s return on equity of -15.13% beat Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.-- -- $129.4M ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ASMMF or ILKAF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Iluka Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has higher upside potential than Iluka Resources Ltd., analysts believe Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is more attractive than Iluka Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.0 0 0 ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASMMF or ILKAF More Risky?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.616%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASMMF or ILKAF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iluka Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASMMF or ILKAF?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Iluka Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is 37.89x versus 2.15x for Iluka Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.37.89x -- -- -- ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.15x 12.64x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASMMF or IONR?
ioneer Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s return on equity of -15.13% beat ioneer Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.-- -- $129.4M IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASMMF or IONR?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ioneer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 529.21%. Given that ioneer Ltd. has higher upside potential than Australian Strategic Materials Ltd., analysts believe ioneer Ltd. is more attractive than Australian Strategic Materials Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.0 0 0 IONRioneer Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASMMF or IONR More Risky?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ioneer Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASMMF or IONR?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ioneer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ioneer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASMMF or IONR?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ioneer Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ioneer Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ioneer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is 37.89x versus -- for ioneer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.37.89x -- -- -- IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASMMF or NVA?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s return on equity of -15.13% beat Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.-- -- $129.4M NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASMMF or NVA?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Australian Strategic Materials Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Australian Strategic Materials Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.0 0 0 NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is ASMMF or NVA More Risky?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a beta of 1.687, which suggesting that the stock is 68.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASMMF or NVA?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASMMF or NVA?
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Strategic Materials Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nova Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Strategic Materials Ltd. is 37.89x versus -- for Nova Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASMMFAustralian Strategic Materials Ltd.37.89x -- -- -- NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
