Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
38
ILKAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.83
Seasonality move
:
-0.27%
Day range:
$3.72 - $3.86
52-week range:
$1.66 - $7.54
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.55x
P/S ratio:
2.53x
P/B ratio:
1.15x
Volume:
17K
Avg. volume:
26K
1-year change:
11.99%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$654.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.45
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
$3.83 | -- | $1.6B | 13.55x | $0.02 | 0% | 2.53x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
$0.35 | -- | $93M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 208.61x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.52 | -- | $581.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $20.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
9.6% | 0.829 | -- | 1.35x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | 0.324 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ILKAF
Iluka Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.43% | 10.19% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Iluka Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ILKAF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19% beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ILKAF or FTZZF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iluka Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Iluka Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ILKAF or FTZZF More Risky?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILKAF or FTZZF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILKAF or FTZZF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Iluka Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.55x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iluka Resources Ltd. is 2.53x versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.53x 13.55x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILKAF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19% beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ILKAF or HMIFF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iluka Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Iluka Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ILKAF or HMIFF More Risky?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILKAF or HMIFF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILKAF or HMIFF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Iluka Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.55x while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iluka Resources Ltd. is 2.53x versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.53x 13.55x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILKAF or HZRGF?
Hazer Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19% beat Hazer Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILKAF or HZRGF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hazer Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iluka Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hazer Group Ltd., analysts believe Iluka Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Hazer Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ILKAF or HZRGF More Risky?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hazer Group Ltd. has a beta of 77.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7620.487%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILKAF or HZRGF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hazer Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Hazer Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILKAF or HZRGF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hazer Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hazer Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Iluka Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.55x while Hazer Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iluka Resources Ltd. is 2.53x versus 208.61x for Hazer Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.53x 13.55x -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.208.61x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILKAF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19% beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About ILKAF or NUFMF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iluka Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Iluka Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ILKAF or NUFMF More Risky?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILKAF or NUFMF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nufarm Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILKAF or NUFMF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Iluka Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.55x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iluka Resources Ltd. is 2.53x versus 0.26x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.53x 13.55x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.26x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ILKAF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.19% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.-- -- $1.6B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ILKAF or SBMSF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iluka Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Iluka Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ILKAF or SBMSF More Risky?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ILKAF or SBMSF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Iluka Resources Ltd. pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ILKAF or SBMSF?
Iluka Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iluka Resources Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Iluka Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.55x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iluka Resources Ltd. is 2.53x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ILKAFIluka Resources Ltd.2.53x 13.55x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
