Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
39
AOCIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.29
Seasonality move
:
-5.87%
Day range:
$17.29 - $17.29
52-week range:
$10.73 - $25.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
14.52x
P/S ratio:
0.13x
P/B ratio:
1.15x
Volume:
505
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
45.66%
Market cap:
$399.4M
Revenue:
$3.9B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOCIF
AutoCanada, Inc.
|
$852.2M | -- | 69.78% | -- | -- |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EICCF
E Automotive, Inc.
|
$32.7M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$700.6M | $0.86 | -9.66% | -14.05% | $6.00 |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$2.5B | $2.22 | -1.01% | -20.87% | $207.11 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -3.45% | 75.59% | $31.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOCIF
AutoCanada, Inc.
|
$17.29 | -- | $399.4M | 14.52x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
$0.92 | -- | $17.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
EICCF
E Automotive, Inc.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $597.4K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$3.95 | $6.00 | $251.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.15x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$210.67 | $207.11 | $24.7B | 14.70x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.30x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$28.00 | $31.50 | $843.3M | 300.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOCIF
AutoCanada, Inc.
|
79.01% | 3.238 | 245.9% | 0.19x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
109.08% | 1.323 | -- | 0.06x |
|
EICCF
E Automotive, Inc.
|
29.66% | 2.931 | 482700.09% | 0.86x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
63.27% | 0.328 | 127.91% | 0.14x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
28.14% | 0.561 | 8.72% | 0.70x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.450 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AOCIF
AutoCanada, Inc.
|
$52.2M | $18.7M | 3.66% | 18% | 2.15% | -$37.5M |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -7.15% | -- | -- | -- |
|
EICCF
E Automotive, Inc.
|
$14.4M | $390K | -0.69% | -0.96% | 1.19% | $3.1M |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$63.9M | -$50.5M | -33.28% | -63.15% | -23.47% | -$145.6M |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$1.4B | $444.7M | 29.2% | 40.5% | 17.33% | $82.4M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
AutoCanada, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AOCIF or BGI?
Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of -0.24% compared to AutoCanada, Inc.'s net margin of --. AutoCanada, Inc.'s return on equity of 18% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.5.99% $0.47 $1.7B BGIBirks Group, Inc.-- -- $67M -
What do Analysts Say About AOCIF or BGI?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AutoCanada, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe AutoCanada, Inc. is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0 0 0 BGIBirks Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AOCIF or BGI More Risky?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOCIF or BGI?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoCanada, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOCIF or BGI?
AutoCanada, Inc. quarterly revenues are $872.3M, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. AutoCanada, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, AutoCanada, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoCanada, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.13x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0.13x 14.52x $872.3M -$2.1M BGIBirks Group, Inc.0.13x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AOCIF or EICCF?
E Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of -0.24% compared to AutoCanada, Inc.'s net margin of 7.61%. AutoCanada, Inc.'s return on equity of 18% beat E Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.5.99% $0.47 $1.7B EICCFE Automotive, Inc.43.99% $0.04 $97.2M -
What do Analysts Say About AOCIF or EICCF?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand E Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AutoCanada, Inc. has higher upside potential than E Automotive, Inc., analysts believe AutoCanada, Inc. is more attractive than E Automotive, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0 0 0 EICCFE Automotive, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is AOCIF or EICCF More Risky?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison E Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOCIF or EICCF?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. E Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoCanada, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. E Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOCIF or EICCF?
AutoCanada, Inc. quarterly revenues are $872.3M, which are larger than E Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32.7M. AutoCanada, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than E Automotive, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, AutoCanada, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while E Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoCanada, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.00x for E Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0.13x 14.52x $872.3M -$2.1M EICCFE Automotive, Inc.0.00x -- $32.7M $2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns AOCIF or FLWS?
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of -0.24% compared to AutoCanada, Inc.'s net margin of -24.61%. AutoCanada, Inc.'s return on equity of 18% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.5.99% $0.47 $1.7B FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.29.68% -$0.83 $592.1M -
What do Analysts Say About AOCIF or FLWS?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.9%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than AutoCanada, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than AutoCanada, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0 0 0 FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is AOCIF or FLWS More Risky?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOCIF or FLWS?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoCanada, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOCIF or FLWS?
AutoCanada, Inc. quarterly revenues are $872.3M, which are larger than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. AutoCanada, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, AutoCanada, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoCanada, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.15x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0.13x 14.52x $872.3M -$2.1M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0.15x -- $215.2M -$53M
-
Which has Higher Returns AOCIF or LULU?
lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of -0.24% compared to AutoCanada, Inc.'s net margin of 11.96%. AutoCanada, Inc.'s return on equity of 18% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.5.99% $0.47 $1.7B LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.55.5% $2.59 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AOCIF or LULU?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $207.11 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than AutoCanada, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than AutoCanada, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0 0 0 LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.2 29 1 -
Is AOCIF or LULU More Risky?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOCIF or LULU?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoCanada, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOCIF or LULU?
AutoCanada, Inc. quarterly revenues are $872.3M, which are smaller than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. AutoCanada, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M. Notably, AutoCanada, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoCanada, Inc. is 0.13x versus 2.30x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0.13x 14.52x $872.3M -$2.1M LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.2.30x 14.70x $2.6B $306.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns AOCIF or ODP?
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of -0.24% compared to AutoCanada, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. AutoCanada, Inc.'s return on equity of 18% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.5.99% $0.47 $1.7B ODPThe ODP Corp.20.37% $0.77 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About AOCIF or ODP?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that The ODP Corp. has higher upside potential than AutoCanada, Inc., analysts believe The ODP Corp. is more attractive than AutoCanada, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0 0 0 ODPThe ODP Corp.0 1 0 -
Is AOCIF or ODP More Risky?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOCIF or ODP?
AutoCanada, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoCanada, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AOCIF or ODP?
AutoCanada, Inc. quarterly revenues are $872.3M, which are smaller than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. AutoCanada, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, AutoCanada, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoCanada, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AOCIFAutoCanada, Inc.0.13x 14.52x $872.3M -$2.1M ODPThe ODP Corp.0.13x 300.11x $1.6B $23M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 31
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 31
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
80
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is up 14.37% over the past day.
