AGFMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AVX has a net margin of 30.82% compared to AGF Management Ltd.'s net margin of --. AGF Management Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.67% beat AVX's return on equity of --.

AGF Management Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVX has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AGF Management Ltd. has higher upside potential than AVX, analysts believe AGF Management Ltd. is more attractive than AVX.

AGF Management Ltd. has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVX has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AGF Management Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. AVX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGF Management Ltd. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. AVX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGF Management Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGF Management Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.1M, which are larger than AVX quarterly revenues of --. AGF Management Ltd.'s net income of $32.1M is higher than AVX's net income of --. Notably, AGF Management Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while AVX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGF Management Ltd. is 2.50x versus -- for AVX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of 30.82% compared to AGF Management Ltd.'s net margin of --. AGF Management Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.67% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

AGF Management Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AGF Management Ltd. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe AGF Management Ltd. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

AGF Management Ltd. has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.913%.

AGF Management Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. AGF Management Ltd. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGF Management Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGF Management Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.1M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. AGF Management Ltd.'s net income of $32.1M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, AGF Management Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGF Management Ltd. is 2.50x versus 25.80x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 30.82% compared to AGF Management Ltd.'s net margin of 21.69%. AGF Management Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.67% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.

AGF Management Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than AGF Management Ltd., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than AGF Management Ltd..

AGF Management Ltd. has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.

AGF Management Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. AGF Management Ltd. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGF Management Ltd. quarterly revenues are $104.1M, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. AGF Management Ltd.'s net income of $32.1M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, AGF Management Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGF Management Ltd. is 2.50x versus 6.23x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.