ADWPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net margin of -410.37%. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.36% beat Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amaze Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 348.16%. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Andrew Peller Ltd., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Andrew Peller Ltd..

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Amaze Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Andrew Peller Ltd. pays 93.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andrew Peller Ltd. quarterly revenues are $76.6M, which are larger than Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net income of $6.5M is higher than Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Andrew Peller Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andrew Peller Ltd. is 0.56x versus 0.34x for Amaze Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGP Ingredients, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net margin of 11.64%. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.36% beat MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.77%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGP Ingredients, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.20 which suggests that it could grow by 49.65%. Given that MGP Ingredients, Inc. has higher upside potential than Andrew Peller Ltd., analysts believe MGP Ingredients, Inc. is more attractive than Andrew Peller Ltd..

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGP Ingredients, Inc. has a beta of 0.391, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.854%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. MGP Ingredients, Inc. offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Andrew Peller Ltd. pays 93.63% of its earnings as a dividend. MGP Ingredients, Inc. pays out 30.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andrew Peller Ltd. quarterly revenues are $76.6M, which are smaller than MGP Ingredients, Inc. quarterly revenues of $130.9M. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net income of $6.5M is lower than MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M. Notably, Andrew Peller Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while MGP Ingredients, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andrew Peller Ltd. is 0.56x versus 0.90x for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net margin of -480.68%. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.36% beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4060.6%. Given that Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Andrew Peller Ltd., analysts believe Splash Beverage Group, Inc. is more attractive than Andrew Peller Ltd..

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Andrew Peller Ltd. pays 93.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andrew Peller Ltd. quarterly revenues are $76.6M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net income of $6.5M is higher than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Andrew Peller Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andrew Peller Ltd. is 0.56x versus 1.73x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net margin of -13.08%. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.36% beat Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.79%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Andrew Peller Ltd. has higher upside potential than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc., analysts believe Andrew Peller Ltd. is more attractive than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc..

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. has a beta of 0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.624%.

Andrew Peller Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Andrew Peller Ltd. pays 93.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. pays out 765.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s is not.

Andrew Peller Ltd. quarterly revenues are $76.6M, which are larger than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Andrew Peller Ltd.'s net income of $6.5M is higher than Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Andrew Peller Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andrew Peller Ltd. is 0.56x versus 0.42x for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.