Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…
Buy
57
SPXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$105.85
Seasonality move
:
0.56%
Day range:
$104.36 - $105.52
52-week range:
$79.66 - $106.86
Dividend yield:
1.37%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
20.8K
Avg. volume:
21.2K
1-year change:
10.79%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
$104.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.37% | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$75.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.3% | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
$95.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.01% | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$53.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.05% | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
$92.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 | 0.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.608 | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | 0.262 | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 0.703 | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXT or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXT or CFO?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXT or CFO More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.898, which suggesting that the stock is 10.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.479%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXT or CFO?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXT or CFO?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXT or FTCS?
First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Capital Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXT or FTCS?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Capital Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Capital Strength ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is more attractive than First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXT or FTCS More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.898, which suggesting that the stock is 10.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a beta of 0.787, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.28%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXT or FTCS?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. First Trust Capital Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Capital Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXT or FTCS?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Capital Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Capital Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Capital Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Capital Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXT or PALC?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXT or PALC?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is more attractive than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXT or PALC More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.898, which suggesting that the stock is 10.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.173%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXT or PALC?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXT or PALC?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPXT or POWA?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPXT or POWA?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is SPXT or POWA More Risky?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.898, which suggesting that the stock is 10.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPXT or POWA?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPXT or POWA?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Goldman Sachs Going to Go Up?
Shares of financial giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) have soared by…
How High Will MSTR Stock Go?
After several months of pressure, shares of Bitcoin treasury Strategy…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Sell
42
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RAPT alert for Jan 21
Rapt Therapeutics, Inc. [RAPT] is up 0.05% over the past day.
Buy
73
HYMC alert for Jan 21
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is down 7.55% over the past day.
Buy
92
GMINF alert for Jan 21
G Mining Ventures Corp. [GMINF] is down 0.81% over the past day.
