Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
48
PALC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.17
Seasonality move
:
1.06%
Day range:
$53.08 - $53.23
52-week range:
$42.72 - $53.23
Dividend yield:
1.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
8.9K
Avg. volume:
24.9K
1-year change:
6.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHE
State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$53.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.03% | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
$93.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.03% | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
$91.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 | 0.93% | -- |
|
SHE
State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF
|
$133.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.46 | 1.17% | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
$104.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.37% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 0.852 | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | 0.429 | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | 0.590 | -- | -- |
|
SHE
State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF
|
-- | 0.910 | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.789 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHE
State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or FTCS?
First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Capital Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Capital Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Capital Strength ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or FTCS More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 2.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a beta of 0.787, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.329%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. First Trust Capital Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Capital Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Capital Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Capital Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Capital Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Capital Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or POWA?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or POWA?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or POWA More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 2.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.225%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or POWA?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or POWA?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or SHE?
State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- SHEState Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or SHE?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 SHEState Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or SHE More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 2.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.266%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or SHE?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or SHE?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- SHEState Street SPDR MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or SPXT?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or SPXT More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 2.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.286%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
