NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
43
PALC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$49.49
Seasonality move
:
6.17%
Day range:
$48.77 - $49.94
52-week range:
$39.91 - $52.91
Dividend yield:
0.86%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
18.7K
Avg. volume:
14.2K
1-year change:
22.62%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$49.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0.86% | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
$88.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.33% | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
$42.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.02% | -- |
|
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF
|
$52.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.39% | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
$92.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.46% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 1.257 | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | 0.853 | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | 1.040 | -- | -- |
|
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF
|
-- | 1.039 | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.857 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or FTCS?
First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Capital Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Capital Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Capital Strength ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or FTCS More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. First Trust Capital Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Capital Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Capital Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Capital Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Capital Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Capital Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or NACP?
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or NACP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or NACP More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.90399999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or NACP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or NACP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- NACPImpact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or QARP?
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- QARPXtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or QARP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 QARPXtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or QARP More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.153%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or QARP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or QARP?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- QARPXtrackers Russell 1000 US Qlty at a Rsnbl Prce ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or SPXT?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or SPXT More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.72%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 3.03% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 3.83% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.46% over the past day.
