3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Buy
60
POWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$83.01
Seasonality move
:
2.78%
Day range:
$82.71 - $82.95
52-week range:
$73.16 - $87.68
Dividend yield:
0.78%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.1K
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
7.42%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
$82.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.64 | 0.78% | -- |
|
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
|
$38.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.03% | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$68.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.36% | -- |
|
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
|
$102.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.29% | -- |
|
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
|
$171.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.78 | 1.94% | -- |
|
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
|
$212.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.80 | 1.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | 0.772 | -- | -- |
|
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
|
-- | 1.117 | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.922 | -- | -- |
|
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.062 | -- | -- |
|
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
|
-- | 0.603 | -- | -- |
|
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
|
-- | 1.008 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns POWA or BIBL?
Inspire 100 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of -- beat Inspire 100 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- BIBLInspire 100 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWA or BIBL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inspire 100 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has higher upside potential than Inspire 100 ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is more attractive than Inspire 100 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 BIBLInspire 100 ETF0 0 0 -
Is POWA or BIBL More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspire 100 ETF has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.048%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWA or BIBL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Inspire 100 ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspire 100 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWA or BIBL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inspire 100 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of -- is lower than Inspire 100 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspire 100 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is -- versus -- for Inspire 100 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -- BIBLInspire 100 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns POWA or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWA or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is POWA or CFO More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.709, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.089%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWA or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWA or CFO?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns POWA or FEX?
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- FEXFirst Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWA or FEX?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is more attractive than First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 FEXFirst Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is POWA or FEX More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWA or FEX?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWA or FEX?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -- FEXFirst Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns POWA or LGLV?
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- LGLVSPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWA or LGLV?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is more attractive than SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 LGLVSPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is POWA or LGLV More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWA or LGLV?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWA or LGLV?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -- LGLVSPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns POWA or PTL?
Inspire 500 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of -- beat Inspire 500 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- PTLInspire 500 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About POWA or PTL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inspire 500 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has higher upside potential than Inspire 500 ETF, analysts believe Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is more attractive than Inspire 500 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 PTLInspire 500 ETF0 0 0 -
Is POWA or PTL More Risky?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.842, which suggesting that the stock is 15.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspire 500 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock POWA or PTL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Inspire 500 ETF offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspire 500 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios POWA or PTL?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inspire 500 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of -- is lower than Inspire 500 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspire 500 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF is -- versus -- for Inspire 500 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -- PTLInspire 500 ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
