Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Buy
70
ONLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$45.87
Seasonality move
:
1.32%
Day range:
$45.78 - $46.00
52-week range:
$32.67 - $48.90
Dividend yield:
0.2%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
8.4K
Avg. volume:
9.8K
1-year change:
25.47%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
$45.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.2% | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
$21.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.28% | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$40.68 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 2.87% | -- |
|
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
|
$28.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.2% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$101.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.38% | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
$109.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.733 | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
|
-- | 1.596 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.051 | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | 2.071 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Online Retail ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ONLN or AWAY?
Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Travel Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONLN or AWAY?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Travel Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Online Retail ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Travel Tech ETF, analysts believe ProShares Online Retail ETF is more attractive than Amplify Travel Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONLN or AWAY More Risky?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONLN or AWAY?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Amplify Travel Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Travel Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONLN or AWAY?
ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Travel Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Travel Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Online Retail ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Travel Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Online Retail ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Travel Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONLN or BJK?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONLN or BJK?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Online Retail ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gaming ETF, analysts believe ProShares Online Retail ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONLN or BJK More Risky?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONLN or BJK?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. VanEck Gaming ETF offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONLN or BJK?
ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Online Retail ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Online Retail ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONLN or EBIZ?
Global X E-commerce ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X E-commerce ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- EBIZGlobal X E-commerce ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONLN or EBIZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X E-commerce ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Online Retail ETF has higher upside potential than Global X E-commerce ETF, analysts believe ProShares Online Retail ETF is more attractive than Global X E-commerce ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 EBIZGlobal X E-commerce ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONLN or EBIZ More Risky?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X E-commerce ETF has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.838%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONLN or EBIZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Global X E-commerce ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X E-commerce ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONLN or EBIZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X E-commerce ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X E-commerce ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Online Retail ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X E-commerce ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Online Retail ETF is -- versus -- for Global X E-commerce ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -- EBIZGlobal X E-commerce ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONLN or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONLN or PEZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Online Retail ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe ProShares Online Retail ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONLN or PEZ More Risky?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.435%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONLN or PEZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONLN or PEZ?
ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Online Retail ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Online Retail ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONLN or PSCD?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONLN or PSCD?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Online Retail ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF, analysts believe ProShares Online Retail ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONLN or PSCD More Risky?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.049% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.74%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONLN or PSCD?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONLN or PSCD?
ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Online Retail ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Online Retail ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
