Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
47
ION Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.63
Seasonality move
:
-7.35%
Day range:
$46.42 - $47.03
52-week range:
$20.72 - $48.10
Dividend yield:
1.23%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.7K
Avg. volume:
6.2K
1-year change:
69.03%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
$46.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.23% | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
$45.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$42.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
$39.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 4.99% | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
$33.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.4% | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$53.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | 1.254 | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | 1.755 | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.679 | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | 1.036 | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.278 | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 2.126 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ION or DAT?
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ION or DAT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is more attractive than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF0 0 0 -
Is ION or DAT More Risky?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ION or DAT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ION or DAT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ION or OND?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ION or OND?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares On-Demand ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares On-Demand ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is more attractive than ProShares On-Demand ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 -
Is ION or OND More Risky?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ION or OND?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. ProShares On-Demand ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ION or OND?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares On-Demand ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares On-Demand ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ION or SUPL?
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ION or SUPL?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is more attractive than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF0 0 0 -
Is ION or SUPL More Risky?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ION or SUPL?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ION or SUPL?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ION or TINT?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ION or TINT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Smart Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Smart Materials ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is more attractive than ProShares Smart Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is ION or TINT More Risky?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ION or TINT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. ProShares Smart Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ION or TINT?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Smart Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Smart Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -- TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ION or TINY?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net margin of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ION or TINY?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF, analysts believe ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is more attractive than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 -
Is ION or TINY More Risky?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ION or TINY?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ION or TINY?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
