Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$39.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 2.34% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$23.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 4.64% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$33.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.27% | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
$26.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
$28.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 1.78% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$29.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 3.25% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.182 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.255 | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 0.497 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.572%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.898%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.071%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares China Large-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.94%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares China Large-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares China Large-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.