Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
60
PGJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.10
Seasonality move
:
2.42%
Day range:
$28.86 - $29.74
52-week range:
$23.68 - $34.54
Dividend yield:
3.25%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
20.9K
Avg. volume:
25.7K
1-year change:
4.76%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$29.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 3.25% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$23.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 4.64% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$33.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.27% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$39.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 2.34% | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
$26.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
$28.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 1.78% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 0.497 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.255 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.182 | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or EWH More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or FCA More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.898%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or FXI More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.559%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or KCAI?
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or KCAI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or KCAI More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or KCAI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or KCAI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or OBOR More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.071%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
42
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
66
DIOD alert for Feb 13
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
