Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
56
PGJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.40
Seasonality move
:
3.27%
Day range:
$29.29 - $29.45
52-week range:
$23.68 - $34.54
Dividend yield:
3.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
26.8K
Avg. volume:
22.7K
1-year change:
9.15%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$29.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 3.31% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$21.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 5.04% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$28.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 2.61% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$38.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 2.38% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$99.09 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.35% | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
$26.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 1.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 0.536 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.532 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.500 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.264 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | 0.373 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or EWH More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.5%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or EWH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or FCA More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.299%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or FCA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or FXI More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.06600000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or FXI?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or GXC More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or OBOR More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or OBOR?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
