Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
73
BETZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.95
Seasonality move
:
4.12%
Day range:
$20.63 - $22.09
52-week range:
$16.73 - $25.48
Dividend yield:
0.74%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
86.1K
Avg. volume:
13.8K
1-year change:
14.17%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
$21.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.74% | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$42.09 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 2.77% | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
$24.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.41% | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
$59.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.62% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$106.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.11% | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
$107.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 0.91% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | 1.368 | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.350 | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | 1.271 | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.985 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.123 | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | 1.983 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BETZ or BJK?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net margin of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BETZ or BJK?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gaming ETF, analysts believe Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is BETZ or BJK More Risky?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BETZ or BJK?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. VanEck Gaming ETF offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BETZ or BJK?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BETZ or NERD?
Roundhill Video Games ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net margin of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill Video Games ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BETZ or NERD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill Video Games ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill Video Games ETF, analysts believe Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is more attractive than Roundhill Video Games ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF0 0 0 -
Is BETZ or NERD More Risky?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill Video Games ETF has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.535%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BETZ or NERD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Roundhill Video Games ETF offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill Video Games ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BETZ or NERD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill Video Games ETF quarterly revenues of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill Video Games ETF's net income of --. Notably, Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill Video Games ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill Video Games ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -- NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BETZ or ONLN?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net margin of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BETZ or ONLN?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Online Retail ETF, analysts believe Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is more attractive than ProShares Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BETZ or ONLN More Risky?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.477, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.693%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BETZ or ONLN?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. ProShares Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BETZ or ONLN?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BETZ or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net margin of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BETZ or PEZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is BETZ or PEZ More Risky?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.464%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BETZ or PEZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BETZ or PEZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BETZ or PSCD?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net margin of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BETZ or PSCD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF, analysts believe Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF0 0 0 -
Is BETZ or PSCD More Risky?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BETZ or PSCD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BETZ or PSCD?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
