Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
25
PEZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$99.61
Seasonality move
:
2.15%
Day range:
$100.87 - $100.87
52-week range:
$79.22 - $113.42
Dividend yield:
0.38%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
792
Avg. volume:
2.4K
1-year change:
24.64%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$100.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.38% | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
$21.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.29% | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
$19.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$42.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.71 | 0% | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
$65.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
$52.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.4% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.051 | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | 1.170 | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.892 | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 0.982 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PEZ or AWAY?
Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Travel Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PEZ or AWAY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Travel Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Travel Tech ETF, analysts believe Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is more attractive than Amplify Travel Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is PEZ or AWAY More Risky?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PEZ or AWAY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Amplify Travel Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Travel Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PEZ or AWAY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Travel Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Travel Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Travel Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Travel Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PEZ or BETZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PEZ or BETZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF, analysts believe Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is more attractive than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is PEZ or BETZ More Risky?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PEZ or BETZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PEZ or BETZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PEZ or BJK?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PEZ or BJK?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Gaming ETF, analysts believe Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is more attractive than VanEck Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is PEZ or BJK More Risky?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PEZ or BJK?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. VanEck Gaming ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PEZ or BJK?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -- BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PEZ or IBUY?
Amplify Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PEZ or IBUY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Online Retail ETF, analysts believe Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is more attractive than Amplify Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is PEZ or IBUY More Risky?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.47%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PEZ or IBUY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Amplify Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PEZ or IBUY?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PEZ or PEJ?
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PEZ or PEJ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF, analysts believe Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is more attractive than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is PEZ or PEJ More Risky?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.932%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PEZ or PEJ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PEZ or PEJ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
