3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Buy
51
BJK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.49
Seasonality move
:
-1.57%
Day range:
$38.45 - $38.45
52-week range:
$33.40 - $45.54
Dividend yield:
3.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
428
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
-6.47%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$38.45 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 3.03% | -- |
|
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
|
$59.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.04% | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
$44.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.77% | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
$50.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.12% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$89.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0% | -- |
|
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF
|
$50.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.99% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.365 | -- | -- |
|
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.461 | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.689 | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 1.429 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.270 | -- | -- |
|
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF
|
-- | 1.247 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Gaming ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or FXD?
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- FXDFirst Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or FXD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 FXDFirst Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is BJK or FXD More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.221, which suggesting that the stock is 22.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.021%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or FXD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or FXD?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- FXDFirst Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or ONLN?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Online Retail ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than ProShares Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or ONLN More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.221, which suggesting that the stock is 22.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.221%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. ProShares Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEJ?
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEJ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.221, which suggesting that the stock is 22.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.314%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.221, which suggesting that the stock is 22.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.485%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or RSPD?
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- RSPDInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or RSPD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 RSPDInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or RSPD More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.221, which suggesting that the stock is 22.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.826%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or RSPD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or RSPD?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- RSPDInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Con DiscrtN ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
