Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
48
BJK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.70
Seasonality move
:
2.43%
Day range:
$37.86 - $37.97
52-week range:
$33.40 - $47.30
Dividend yield:
3.6%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.1K
Avg. volume:
2.4K
1-year change:
-5.66%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$37.92 | -- | -- | -- | $1.36 | 3.6% | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
$66.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.12% | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
$54.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.33% | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
$60.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.24% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$105.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.11% | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
$115.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 0.86% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.178 | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.618 | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.975 | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 1.834 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 1.826 | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | 2.095 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Gaming ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or IBUY?
Amplify Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Online Retail ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Amplify Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or IBUY More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.110, which suggesting that the stock is 11.015% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Amplify Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or ONLN?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Online Retail ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than ProShares Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or ONLN More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.110, which suggesting that the stock is 11.015% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.096%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. ProShares Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEJ?
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEJ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.110, which suggesting that the stock is 11.015% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.110, which suggesting that the stock is 11.015% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.242%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PSCD?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PSCD More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.110, which suggesting that the stock is 11.015% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.713%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
