Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
50
BJK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.87
Seasonality move
:
-0.07%
Day range:
$40.86 - $41.22
52-week range:
$33.40 - $47.30
Dividend yield:
3.32%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.3K
Avg. volume:
2.5K
1-year change:
1.03%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$41.10 | -- | -- | -- | $1.36 | 3.32% | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
$20.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0% | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
$21.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.74% | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
$59.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.3% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$106.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.11% | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
$106.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 0.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.350 | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.092 | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | 1.368 | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 2.007 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.123 | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | 1.983 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Gaming ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or AWAY?
Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Travel Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Travel Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Travel Tech ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Amplify Travel Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or AWAY More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Amplify Travel Tech ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Travel Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Travel Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Travel Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Travel Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Travel Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or BETZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or BETZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.906%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or ONLN?
ProShares Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Online Retail ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than ProShares Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or ONLN More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. ProShares Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or ONLN?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- ONLNProShares Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.464%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PSCD?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PSCD More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PSCD?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discretionary ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
