Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
53
AQWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.92
Seasonality move
:
0.16%
Day range:
$19.16 - $19.29
52-week range:
$15.53 - $20.27
Dividend yield:
1.34%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.6K
Avg. volume:
44.6K
1-year change:
11.46%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$19.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.34% | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
$39.92 | -- | -- | -- | $4.55 | 11.39% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$28.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.72 | 2.47% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$12.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 6.9% | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
$16.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 2.48% | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
$38.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 2.32% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.919 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.698 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 1.525 | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.089 | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.814 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Clean Water ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or COPJ?
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or COPJ More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 11.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.55 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or COPJ?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or CUT More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or LITP More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 6.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or NIKL?
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or NIKL More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Sprott Nickel Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Nickel Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or VEGI?
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or VEGI More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.786%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
