Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
37
AQWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.14
Seasonality move
:
1.38%
Day range:
$18.95 - $19.20
52-week range:
$15.53 - $20.92
Dividend yield:
1.45%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
8.2K
Avg. volume:
57.3K
1-year change:
11.3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$19.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.45% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$28.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.72 | 2.51% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$13.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 6.59% | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
$15.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 2.49% | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
$45.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 1.96% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.960 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.749 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.776 | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.936 | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.474 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Clean Water ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or CUT More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.171%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or CUT?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or LITP More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or LITP?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or NIKL?
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or NIKL More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Nickel Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Sprott Nickel Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Nickel Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or NIKL?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Nickel Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- NIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AQWA or VEGI?
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Clean Water ETF's net margin of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Clean Water ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF, analysts believe Global X Clean Water ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is AQWA or VEGI More Risky?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a beta of 0.817, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.278%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Global X Clean Water ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AQWA or VEGI?
Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Clean Water ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Clean Water ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
