Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Buy
68
ZIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.41
Seasonality move
:
-12.82%
Day range:
$21.83 - $22.56
52-week range:
$11.04 - $22.80
Dividend yield:
19.02%
P/E ratio:
2.70x
P/S ratio:
0.36x
P/B ratio:
0.68x
Volume:
2.1M
Avg. volume:
4.9M
1-year change:
8.59%
Market cap:
$2.7B
Revenue:
$8.4B
EPS (TTM):
$8.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
|
$1.5B | -$0.99 | -30.84% | -88.67% | $13.78 |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$93.7M | -$0.38 | -4.25% | -46.08% | $4.00 |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$2.1B | $2.91 | 8.18% | 45.26% | $544.60 |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
|
$6.3M | -- | -10.08% | -100% | $15.00 |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$48M | $0.41 | 17.07% | 25.46% | $49.67 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
|
$22.50 | $13.78 | $2.7B | 2.70x | $0.31 | 19.02% | 0.36x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$2.06 | $4.00 | $71.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$683.36 | $544.60 | $31.7B | 69.42x | $0.75 | 0.4% | 4.09x |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
$68.06 | -- | $23.9B | 14.33x | $4.64 | 6.82% | 1.12x |
|
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
|
$7.91 | $15.00 | $35.2M | 6.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.11x |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$51.23 | $49.67 | $663.5M | 38.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.48x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
|
58.5% | 0.280 | 345.8% | 1.22x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
33.36% | 0.762 | 200.47% | 0.85x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
21.04% | -1.073 | 4.52% | 0.69x |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
26.25% | -0.067 | 32.01% | 0.97x |
|
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
|
35.61% | 8.088 | 42.12% | 6.38x |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
9.28% | 0.964 | 3.06% | 2.18x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
|
$331M | $253.6M | 10.23% | 25.33% | 14.27% | $502.1M |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$17.6M | -$12M | -19.37% | -28.18% | -11.79% | -$7.3M |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$478.2M | $171.4M | 9.41% | 12.97% | 8.92% | $115.2M |
|
HPGLY
Hapag-Lloyd AG
|
$384.7M | $188.7M | 5.96% | 7.93% | 3.46% | $580.5M |
|
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
|
$3.8M | $771K | 10.16% | 19.89% | 12.39% | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$11.6M | $5.3M | 10.17% | 11.64% | 11.38% | $4.8M |
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or CSTE?
Caesarstone Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of -17.71%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.18.63% $1.02 $9.7B CSTECaesarstone Ltd.17.27% -$0.52 $343.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling downside risk potential of -38.76%. On the other hand Caesarstone Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 94.18%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0 2 1 CSTECaesarstone Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is ZIM or CSTE More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.02%. Caesarstone Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Caesarstone Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues of $102.1M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Caesarstone Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.36x versus 0.18x for Caesarstone Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0.36x 2.70x $1.8B $123.4M CSTECaesarstone Ltd.0.18x -- $102.1M -$18.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or ESLT?
Elbit Systems Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 6.96%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.18.63% $1.02 $9.7B ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.24.89% $2.80 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling downside risk potential of -38.76%. On the other hand Elbit Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $544.60 which suggests that it could fall by -20.31%. Given that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has more downside risk than Elbit Systems Ltd., analysts believe Elbit Systems Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0 2 1 ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.1 4 0 -
Is ZIM or ESLT More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems Ltd. has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.338%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.02%. Elbit Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd. pays out 29.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Elbit Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is lower than Elbit Systems Ltd.'s net income of $133.7M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Elbit Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 69.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.36x versus 4.09x for Elbit Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0.36x 2.70x $1.8B $123.4M ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.4.09x 69.42x $1.9B $133.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or HPGLY?
Hapag-Lloyd AG has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 2.95%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Hapag-Lloyd AG's return on equity of 7.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.18.63% $1.02 $9.7B HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG7.06% $0.45 $28.4B -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or HPGLY?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling downside risk potential of -38.76%. On the other hand Hapag-Lloyd AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hapag-Lloyd AG, analysts believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is more attractive than Hapag-Lloyd AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0 2 1 HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or HPGLY More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hapag-Lloyd AG has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.042%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or HPGLY?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.02%. Hapag-Lloyd AG offers a yield of 6.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.64 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Hapag-Lloyd AG pays out 45.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or HPGLY?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Hapag-Lloyd AG quarterly revenues of $5.5B. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is lower than Hapag-Lloyd AG's net income of $160.8M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Hapag-Lloyd AG's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.36x versus 1.12x for Hapag-Lloyd AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0.36x 2.70x $1.8B $123.4M HPGLYHapag-Lloyd AG1.12x 14.33x $5.5B $160.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or SPCB?
SuperCom Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 11.1%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat SuperCom Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.18.63% $1.02 $9.7B SPCBSuperCom Ltd.60.78% -- $63.4M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling downside risk potential of -38.76%. On the other hand SuperCom Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 89.63%. Given that SuperCom Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe SuperCom Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0 2 1 SPCBSuperCom Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is ZIM or SPCB More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.047%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.02%. SuperCom Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SuperCom Ltd. quarterly revenues of $6.2M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than SuperCom Ltd.'s net income of $691K. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while SuperCom Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.36x versus 3.11x for SuperCom Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0.36x 2.70x $1.8B $123.4M SPCBSuperCom Ltd.3.11x 6.64x $6.2M $691K
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or TATT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 10.47%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.18.63% $1.02 $9.7B TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.78, signalling downside risk potential of -38.76%. On the other hand TAT Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $49.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.05%. Given that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has more downside risk than TAT Technologies Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0 2 1 TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.5 1 0 -
Is ZIM or TATT More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.02%. TAT Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $46.2M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while TAT Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 38.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.36x versus 3.48x for TAT Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.0.36x 2.70x $1.8B $123.4M TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.48x 38.46x $46.2M $4.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.
Sell
50
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
