Financhill
Buy
68

ZIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$20.40
Seasonality move :
21.74%
Day range:
$20.38 - $21.00
52-week range:
$11.04 - $23.61
Dividend yield:
20.98%
P/E ratio:
2.45x
P/S ratio:
0.32x
P/B ratio:
0.61x
Volume:
7.4M
Avg. volume:
5.5M
1-year change:
4.35%
Market cap:
$2.5B
Revenue:
$8.4B
EPS (TTM):
$8.32

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
$1.7B $1.06 -30.72% -88.67% $12.75
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
$97.6M -$0.29 -4.25% -46.08% $4.00
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
$2B $2.73 7.97% 39.99% $534.60
KRNT
Kornit Digital Ltd.
$51.8M $0.02 -4.17% 171.09% $19.50
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
$5.8M -$0.02 -10.08% -100% $15.00
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
$46.3M $0.38 16.85% 25.46% $49.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
$20.40 $12.75 $2.5B 2.45x $0.31 20.98% 0.32x
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
$1.75 $4.00 $60.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.15x
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
$480.11 $534.60 $22.3B 48.77x $0.75 0.51% 2.87x
KRNT
Kornit Digital Ltd.
$13.95 $19.50 $641.3M -- $0.00 0% 3.06x
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
$9.72 $15.00 $43.2M 8.16x $0.00 0% 3.82x
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
$40.12 $49.00 $519.6M 30.12x $0.00 0% 2.73x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
58.5% -0.088 345.8% 1.22x
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
33.36% 0.929 200.47% 0.85x
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
21.04% -0.775 4.52% 0.69x
KRNT
Kornit Digital Ltd.
2.57% 1.623 3.01% 11.10x
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
35.61% 6.579 42.12% 6.38x
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
9.28% 0.757 3.06% 2.18x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
$331M $253.6M 10.23% 25.33% 14.27% $502.1M
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
$17.6M -$12M -19.37% -28.18% -11.79% -$7.3M
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
$478.2M $171.4M 9.41% 12.97% 8.92% $115.2M
KRNT
Kornit Digital Ltd.
$23M -$7.5M -1.73% -1.77% -14.07% $823.6K
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
$3.8M $771K 10.16% 19.89% 12.39% --
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
$11.6M $5.3M 10.17% 11.64% 11.38% $4.8M

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or CSTE?

    Caesarstone Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of -17.71%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    18.63% $1.02 $9.7B
    CSTE
    Caesarstone Ltd.
    17.27% -$0.52 $343.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling downside risk potential of -37.5%. On the other hand Caesarstone Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 128.57%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0 2 2
    CSTE
    Caesarstone Ltd.
    1 0 0
  • Is ZIM or CSTE More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.577%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.98%. Caesarstone Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Caesarstone Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues of $102.1M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.45x while Caesarstone Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.32x versus 0.15x for Caesarstone Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0.32x 2.45x $1.8B $123.4M
    CSTE
    Caesarstone Ltd.
    0.15x -- $102.1M -$18.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or ESLT?

    Elbit Systems Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 6.96%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    18.63% $1.02 $9.7B
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems Ltd.
    24.89% $2.80 $5.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling downside risk potential of -37.5%. On the other hand Elbit Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $534.60 which suggests that it could grow by 11.35%. Given that Elbit Systems Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe Elbit Systems Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0 2 2
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems Ltd.
    1 4 0
  • Is ZIM or ESLT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems Ltd. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.105%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.98%. Elbit Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd. pays out 29.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Elbit Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is lower than Elbit Systems Ltd.'s net income of $133.7M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.45x while Elbit Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 48.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.32x versus 2.87x for Elbit Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0.32x 2.45x $1.8B $123.4M
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems Ltd.
    2.87x 48.77x $1.9B $133.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or KRNT?

    Kornit Digital Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of -4.88%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat Kornit Digital Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    18.63% $1.02 $9.7B
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital Ltd.
    43.37% -$0.06 $726.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling downside risk potential of -37.5%. On the other hand Kornit Digital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.79%. Given that Kornit Digital Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe Kornit Digital Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0 2 2
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital Ltd.
    3 2 0
  • Is ZIM or KRNT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital Ltd. has a beta of 1.873, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.303%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.98%. Kornit Digital Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Kornit Digital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $53.1M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than Kornit Digital Ltd.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.45x while Kornit Digital Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.32x versus 3.06x for Kornit Digital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0.32x 2.45x $1.8B $123.4M
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital Ltd.
    3.06x -- $53.1M -$2.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or SPCB?

    SuperCom Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 11.1%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat SuperCom Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    18.63% $1.02 $9.7B
    SPCB
    SuperCom Ltd.
    60.78% -- $63.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling downside risk potential of -37.5%. On the other hand SuperCom Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.32%. Given that SuperCom Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe SuperCom Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0 2 2
    SPCB
    SuperCom Ltd.
    1 0 0
  • Is ZIM or SPCB More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom Ltd. has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.494%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.98%. SuperCom Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SuperCom Ltd. quarterly revenues of $6.2M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than SuperCom Ltd.'s net income of $691K. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.45x while SuperCom Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.32x versus 3.82x for SuperCom Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0.32x 2.45x $1.8B $123.4M
    SPCB
    SuperCom Ltd.
    3.82x 8.16x $6.2M $691K
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or TATT?

    TAT Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 6.94% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net margin of 10.47%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.33% beat TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    18.63% $1.02 $9.7B
    TATT
    TAT Technologies Ltd.
    25.09% $0.37 $188.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling downside risk potential of -37.5%. On the other hand TAT Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $49.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.13%. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0 2 2
    TATT
    TAT Technologies Ltd.
    4 1 0
  • Is ZIM or TATT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.719%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.98%. TAT Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. pays 22.25% of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $46.2M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s net income of $123.4M is higher than TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.45x while TAT Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 30.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is 0.32x versus 2.73x for TAT Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    0.32x 2.45x $1.8B $123.4M
    TATT
    TAT Technologies Ltd.
    2.73x 30.12x $46.2M $4.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock