Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
18
ZIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.29
Seasonality move
:
33.81%
Day range:
$18.02 - $18.54
52-week range:
$9.08 - $30.15
Dividend yield:
21.71%
P/E ratio:
1.53x
P/S ratio:
0.30x
P/B ratio:
0.56x
Volume:
3.3M
Avg. volume:
7.6M
1-year change:
82.72%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$5.2B
EPS (TTM):
$11.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$2.4B | $7.21 | 65.27% | -208% | $17.45 |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone
|
$119.6M | -$0.17 | -22.66% | -84.35% | -- |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems
|
$1.6B | $1.86 | 9.49% | 191.05% | -- |
|
KRNT
Kornit Digital
|
$50.4M | $0.07 | 6.72% | -95.93% | -- |
|
SPCB
SuperCom
|
$6.8M | -$0.40 | 0.33% | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$18.29 | $17.45 | $2.2B | 1.53x | $3.65 | 21.71% | 0.30x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone
|
$4.58 | -- | $158.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.33x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems
|
$257.78 | -- | $11.5B | 44.07x | $0.50 | 0.78% | 1.76x |
|
KRNT
Kornit Digital
|
$32.62 | -- | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.80x |
|
SPCB
SuperCom
|
$3.38 | -- | $6.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies
|
$25.99 | -- | $282.3M | 35.12x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.86x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
3.11% | -0.676 | 4.07% | 1.26x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone
|
1.89% | -3.897 | 3.78% | 1.77x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems
|
25.82% | 0.050 | 12% | 0.64x |
|
KRNT
Kornit Digital
|
-- | 2.913 | -- | 14.87x |
|
SPCB
SuperCom
|
-- | -1.944 | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies
|
12.92% | 1.913 | 8.08% | 1.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
|
$1.3B | $1.2B | 47.96% | 49.93% | 45.37% | $1.4B |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone
|
$21.4M | -$8.8M | -20.85% | -21.29% | -8.22% | $12.4M |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems
|
$412.8M | $125.8M | 6.41% | 8.76% | 7.73% | $5.1M |
|
KRNT
Kornit Digital
|
$24.2M | -$7.1M | -5.27% | -5.27% | -14.04% | $12.8M |
|
SPCB
SuperCom
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies
|
$8.5M | $3.4M | 6.8% | 8.53% | 8.52% | $1.2M |
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or CSTE?
Caesarstone has a net margin of 40.67% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of -3.92%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93% beat Caesarstone's return on equity of -21.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services47.21% $9.34 $4.1B CSTECaesarstone19.85% -$0.12 $310.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Caesarstone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.17%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services1 2 1 CSTECaesarstone0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or CSTE More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesarstone has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.727%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 21.71%. Caesarstone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Caesarstone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or CSTE?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Caesarstone quarterly revenues of $107.6M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B is higher than Caesarstone's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.53x while Caesarstone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.30x versus 0.33x for Caesarstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.30x 1.53x $2.8B $1.1B CSTECaesarstone0.33x -- $107.6M -$4.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or ESLT?
Elbit Systems has a net margin of 40.67% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of 4.61%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services47.21% $9.34 $4.1B ESLTElbit Systems24.03% $1.77 $4.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.44%. Given that Elbit Systems has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe Elbit Systems is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services1 2 1 ESLTElbit Systems0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or ESLT More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 21.71%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or ESLT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.7B. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B is higher than Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.53x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 44.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.30x versus 1.76x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.30x 1.53x $2.8B $1.1B ESLTElbit Systems1.76x 44.07x $1.7B $79.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or KRNT?
Kornit Digital has a net margin of 40.67% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of -1.79%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services47.21% $9.34 $4.1B KRNTKornit Digital47.72% -$0.02 $793.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or KRNT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.9%. Given that Kornit Digital has more downside risk than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more attractive than Kornit Digital.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services1 2 1 KRNTKornit Digital0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or KRNT More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.446%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or KRNT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 21.71%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or KRNT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.53x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.30x versus 7.80x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.30x 1.53x $2.8B $1.1B KRNTKornit Digital7.80x -- $50.7M -$908K
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or SPCB?
SuperCom has a net margin of 40.67% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of --. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93% beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services47.21% $9.34 $4.1B SPCBSuperCom-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 255.03%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services1 2 1 SPCBSuperCom0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or SPCB More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.195%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 21.71%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or SPCB?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B is higher than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.53x while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.30x versus 0.11x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.30x 1.53x $2.8B $1.1B SPCBSuperCom0.11x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZIM or TATT?
TAT Technologies has a net margin of 40.67% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of 7.08%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services47.21% $9.34 $4.1B TATTTAT Technologies20.96% $0.26 $124.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.43%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services1 2 1 TATTTAT Technologies0 0 0 -
Is ZIM or TATT More Risky?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.403%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 21.71%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or TATT?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $40.5M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B is higher than TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.53x while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 35.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.30x versus 1.86x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.30x 1.53x $2.8B $1.1B TATTTAT Technologies1.86x 35.12x $40.5M $2.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
