Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
60
TATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$54.13
Seasonality move
:
4.61%
Day range:
$53.30 - $54.33
52-week range:
$23.37 - $54.80
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
39.68x
P/S ratio:
3.59x
P/B ratio:
4.01x
Volume:
54.4K
Avg. volume:
122K
1-year change:
106.72%
Market cap:
$684.4M
Revenue:
$152.1M
EPS (TTM):
$1.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$48M | $0.41 | 16.19% | 20.55% | $58.67 |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$2.1B | $3.14 | 7.5% | 27.39% | $566.50 |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$52.85 | $58.67 | $684.4M | 39.68x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.59x |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
$0.31 | -- | $16.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 42.82x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$745.58 | $566.50 | $34.6B | 75.74x | $0.75 | 0.36% | 4.46x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
$1.17 | -- | $19.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 57.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
9.28% | 0.738 | 3.06% | 2.18x |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
68.01% | 0.375 | 3% | 1.75x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
21.04% | -1.224 | 4.52% | 0.69x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | 4.049 | -- | 3.25x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$11.6M | $5.3M | 10.17% | 11.64% | 11.38% | $4.8M |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
$91K | -$213K | -97.28% | -167.93% | -98.61% | -$219K |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$478.2M | $171.4M | 9.41% | 12.97% | 8.92% | $115.2M |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -335.02% | -335.02% | -- | -- |
TAT Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TATT or BTSEF?
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a net margin of 10.47% compared to TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64% beat Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TATT or BTSEF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $58.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997), analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)0 0 0 -
Is TATT or BTSEF More Risky?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TATT or BTSEF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TATT or BTSEF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $46.2M, which are larger than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M is higher than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.68x while Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies Ltd. is 3.59x versus -- for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.59x 39.68x $46.2M $4.8M BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TATT or DUKR?
Duke Robotics Corp. has a net margin of 10.47% compared to TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -106.48%. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64% beat Duke Robotics Corp.'s return on equity of -167.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.42.13% -$0.00 $694K -
What do Analysts Say About TATT or DUKR?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $58.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Duke Robotics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Duke Robotics Corp., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Duke Robotics Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TATT or DUKR More Risky?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Robotics Corp. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.53%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TATT or DUKR?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duke Robotics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Robotics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TATT or DUKR?
TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $46.2M, which are larger than Duke Robotics Corp. quarterly revenues of $216K. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M is higher than Duke Robotics Corp.'s net income of -$230K. Notably, TAT Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.68x while Duke Robotics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies Ltd. is 3.59x versus 42.82x for Duke Robotics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.59x 39.68x $46.2M $4.8M DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.42.82x -- $216K -$230K
-
Which has Higher Returns TATT or ESLT?
Elbit Systems Ltd. has a net margin of 10.47% compared to TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 6.96%. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64% beat Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.24.89% $2.80 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TATT or ESLT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $58.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Elbit Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $566.50 which suggests that it could fall by -24.02%. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Elbit Systems Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.1 5 0 -
Is TATT or ESLT More Risky?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems Ltd. has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TATT or ESLT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd. pays out 29.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TATT or ESLT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $46.2M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M is lower than Elbit Systems Ltd.'s net income of $133.7M. Notably, TAT Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.68x while Elbit Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies Ltd. is 3.59x versus 4.46x for Elbit Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.59x 39.68x $46.2M $4.8M ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.4.46x 75.74x $1.9B $133.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns TATT or FTCFF?
FMS Enterprises Migun has a net margin of 10.47% compared to TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64% beat FMS Enterprises Migun's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TATT or FTCFF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $58.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand FMS Enterprises Migun has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than FMS Enterprises Migun, analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than FMS Enterprises Migun.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun0 0 0 -
Is TATT or FTCFF More Risky?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FMS Enterprises Migun has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TATT or FTCFF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FMS Enterprises Migun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMS Enterprises Migun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TATT or FTCFF?
TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $46.2M, which are larger than FMS Enterprises Migun quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M is higher than FMS Enterprises Migun's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.68x while FMS Enterprises Migun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies Ltd. is 3.59x versus -- for FMS Enterprises Migun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.59x 39.68x $46.2M $4.8M FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TATT or PRZO?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 10.47% compared to TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64% beat ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K -
What do Analysts Say About TATT or PRZO?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $58.67, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TATT or PRZO More Risky?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TATT or PRZO?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TATT or PRZO?
TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $46.2M, which are larger than ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M is higher than ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.68x while ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies Ltd. is 3.59x versus 57.91x for ParaZero Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.59x 39.68x $46.2M $4.8M PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.57.91x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.7T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
48
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
54
ACLX alert for Feb 24
Arcellx, Inc. [ACLX] is up 77.43% over the past day.
Buy
65
RNG alert for Feb 24
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is down 12.48% over the past day.
Buy
71
SNSE alert for Feb 24
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is down 2.63% over the past day.
