Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
13
PRZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.81
Seasonality move
:
45.42%
Day range:
$0.71 - $0.83
52-week range:
$0.53 - $2.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
45.90x
P/B ratio:
2.23x
Volume:
375.2K
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
12.15%
Market cap:
$21.6M
Revenue:
$303.4K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$93.7M | -$0.38 | -4.25% | -46.08% | $4.00 |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$2.2B | $3.53 | 7.5% | 39.51% | $754.67 |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$49.5M | $0.40 | 2.73% | -23.55% | $61.17 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
$0.81 | -- | $21.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 45.90x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$1.11 | $4.00 | $42.1M | -- | $0.00 | 28.72% | 0.11x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$888.97 | $754.67 | $41B | 78.24x | $0.75 | 0.31% | 5.25x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$40.13 | $61.17 | $502.4M | 29.37x | $0.00 | 1.77% | 2.76x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | 4.392 | -- | 3.25x |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
49.49% | 0.100 | 212.1% | 0.84x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
18.94% | -0.614 | 3.6% | 0.70x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
9.09% | 2.160 | 3.04% | 2.50x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -335.02% | -335.02% | -- | -- |
|
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
|
$14.6M | -$17.4M | -38.86% | -59.74% | -18.45% | -$12.2M |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$529.8M | $192.5M | 10.84% | 14.33% | 8.96% | $238.5M |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$11.7M | $4.5M | 10.05% | 11.35% | 9.76% | $3.7M |
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or CSTE?
Caesarstone Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -93.12%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -59.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K CSTECaesarstone Ltd.15.47% -$2.54 $275.6M -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or CSTE?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Caesarstone Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 260.36%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 CSTECaesarstone Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is PRZO or CSTE More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of 0.039, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.105%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or CSTE?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caesarstone Ltd. offers a yield of 28.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caesarstone Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or CSTE?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues of $94.4M. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$87.9M. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Caesarstone Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 45.90x versus 0.11x for Caesarstone Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.45.90x -- -- -- CSTECaesarstone Ltd.0.11x -- $94.4M -$87.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or ESLT?
Elbit Systems Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 7.85%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.24.66% $3.52 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elbit Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $754.67 which suggests that it could fall by -15.11%. Given that Elbit Systems Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Elbit Systems Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.1 4 1 -
Is PRZO or ESLT More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems Ltd. has a beta of 0.156, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.409%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd. pays out 25.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Elbit Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Elbit Systems Ltd.'s net income of $168.6M. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elbit Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 78.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 45.90x versus 5.25x for Elbit Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.45.90x -- -- -- ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.5.25x 78.24x $2.1B $168.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or FTCFF?
FMS Enterprises Migun has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat FMS Enterprises Migun's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FMS Enterprises Migun has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than FMS Enterprises Migun, analysts believe ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than FMS Enterprises Migun.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun0 0 0 -
Is PRZO or FTCFF More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FMS Enterprises Migun has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FMS Enterprises Migun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMS Enterprises Migun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FMS Enterprises Migun quarterly revenues of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than FMS Enterprises Migun's net income of --. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FMS Enterprises Migun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 45.90x versus -- for FMS Enterprises Migun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.45.90x -- -- -- FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or TATT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 10.16%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.18% $0.36 $194M -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TAT Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $61.17 which suggests that it could grow by 52.42%. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 -
Is PRZO or TATT More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.894%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $46.5M. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.7M. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 45.90x versus 2.76x for TAT Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.45.90x -- -- -- TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.2.76x 29.37x $46.5M $4.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
