Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Sell
15
PRZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.04
Seasonality move
:
2.72%
Day range:
$1.02 - $1.07
52-week range:
$0.53 - $2.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
51.97x
P/B ratio:
2.23x
Volume:
152K
Avg. volume:
1.9M
1-year change:
-23.91%
Market cap:
$17.5M
Revenue:
$251.8K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.25
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$2.1B | $3.14 | 7.5% | 27.39% | $566.50 |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$48M | $0.41 | 16.19% | 20.55% | $56.17 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
$1.05 | -- | $17.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 51.97x |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
$0.30 | -- | $16M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 40.88x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$676.43 | $566.50 | $31.4B | 68.72x | $0.75 | 0.4% | 4.05x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$49.19 | $56.17 | $637M | 36.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.34x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | 4.049 | -- | 3.25x |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
68.01% | 0.375 | 3% | 1.75x |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
21.04% | -1.224 | 4.52% | 0.69x |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
9.28% | 0.738 | 3.06% | 2.18x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -335.02% | -335.02% | -- | -- |
|
BTSEF
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUKR
Duke Robotics Corp.
|
$91K | -$213K | -97.28% | -167.93% | -98.61% | -$219K |
|
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd.
|
$478.2M | $171.4M | 9.41% | 12.97% | 8.92% | $115.2M |
|
FTCFF
FMS Enterprises Migun
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
|
$11.6M | $5.3M | 10.17% | 11.64% | 11.38% | $4.8M |
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or BTSEF?
Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or BTSEF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997), analysts believe ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)0 0 0 -
Is PRZO or BTSEF More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or BTSEF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or BTSEF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) quarterly revenues of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s net income of --. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 51.97x versus -- for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.51.97x -- -- -- BTSEFBet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or DUKR?
Duke Robotics Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -106.48%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat Duke Robotics Corp.'s return on equity of -167.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.42.13% -$0.00 $694K -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or DUKR?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Duke Robotics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Duke Robotics Corp., analysts believe ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Duke Robotics Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PRZO or DUKR More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Robotics Corp. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.53%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or DUKR?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duke Robotics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Robotics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or DUKR?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Duke Robotics Corp. quarterly revenues of $216K. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Duke Robotics Corp.'s net income of -$230K. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Duke Robotics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 51.97x versus 40.88x for Duke Robotics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.51.97x -- -- -- DUKRDuke Robotics Corp.40.88x -- $216K -$230K
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or ESLT?
Elbit Systems Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 6.96%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.24.89% $2.80 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elbit Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $566.50 which suggests that it could fall by -16.25%. Given that Elbit Systems Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Elbit Systems Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.1 5 0 -
Is PRZO or ESLT More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems Ltd. has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd. pays out 29.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or ESLT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Elbit Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Elbit Systems Ltd.'s net income of $133.7M. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elbit Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 68.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 51.97x versus 4.05x for Elbit Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.51.97x -- -- -- ESLTElbit Systems Ltd.4.05x 68.72x $1.9B $133.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or FTCFF?
FMS Enterprises Migun has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat FMS Enterprises Migun's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FMS Enterprises Migun has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than FMS Enterprises Migun, analysts believe ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than FMS Enterprises Migun.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun0 0 0 -
Is PRZO or FTCFF More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FMS Enterprises Migun has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FMS Enterprises Migun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMS Enterprises Migun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or FTCFF?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FMS Enterprises Migun quarterly revenues of --. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than FMS Enterprises Migun's net income of --. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FMS Enterprises Migun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 51.97x versus -- for FMS Enterprises Migun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.51.97x -- -- -- FTCFFFMS Enterprises Migun-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PRZO or TATT?
TAT Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 10.47%. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -335.02% beat TAT Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.-- -- -$311.6K TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.25.09% $0.37 $188.1M -
What do Analysts Say About PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TAT Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $56.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.18%. Given that TAT Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than ParaZero Technologies Ltd., analysts believe TAT Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than ParaZero Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.6 0 0 -
Is PRZO or TATT More Risky?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.536%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParaZero Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PRZO or TATT?
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TAT Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $46.2M. ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than TAT Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. is 51.97x versus 3.34x for TAT Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.51.97x -- -- -- TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.3.34x 36.93x $46.2M $4.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Is Sandisk The Next Big Memory Stock?
Computer memory manufacturer Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) has quietly been one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 14
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is up 32.06% over the past day.
Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 14
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is up 26.83% over the past day.
Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 14
Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is down 21.88% over the past day.
