WPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of -16.97%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 5.13% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $51.50, signalling downside risk potential of -12.72%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WPP PLC has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe WPP PLC is more attractive than Lendway.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.863% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 1.897, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.693%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WPP PLC pays 382.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.42x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.61x versus -- for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omnicom Group has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of 9.94%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 5.13% beat Omnicom Group's return on equity of 29.77%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $51.50, signalling downside risk potential of -12.72%. On the other hand Omnicom Group has an analysts' consensus of $116.02 which suggests that it could grow by 34.3%. Given that Omnicom Group has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Omnicom Group is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.863% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omnicom Group has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.455%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Omnicom Group offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. WPP PLC pays 382.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group pays out 43.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WPP PLC's is not.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Omnicom Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Omnicom Group's net income of $385.9M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.42x while Omnicom Group's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.61x versus 1.11x for Omnicom Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of 15.84%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 5.13% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 216.03%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $51.50, signalling downside risk potential of -12.72%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.25%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.863% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.219%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WPP PLC pays 382.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $20.1M. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.42x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 19.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.61x versus 3.26x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -- compared to WPP PLC's net margin of -13.74%. WPP PLC's return on equity of 5.13% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.38%.

WPP PLC has a consensus price target of $51.50, signalling downside risk potential of -12.72%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.29%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than WPP PLC.

WPP PLC has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.863% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.842%.

WPP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WPP PLC pays 382.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WPP PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $353.6M. WPP PLC's net income of -- is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of -$48.6M. Notably, WPP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.42x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 47.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WPP PLC is 0.61x versus 1.91x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.