CRTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of -16.97%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $42.58, signalling upside risk potential of 49.63%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than Lendway.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.225%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.85x versus 0.18x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of -6.19%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $42.58, signalling upside risk potential of 49.63%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $18.58 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than Magnite.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.283%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Magnite's PE ratio is 75.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.85x versus 3.34x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WPP PLC has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of --. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat WPP PLC's return on equity of 14.21%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $42.58, signalling upside risk potential of 49.63%. On the other hand WPP PLC has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.87%. Given that Criteo SA has higher upside potential than WPP PLC, analysts believe Criteo SA is more attractive than WPP PLC.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WPP PLC has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.39%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WPP PLC offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC pays out 78.41% of its earnings as a dividend. WPP PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than WPP PLC quarterly revenues of --. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is higher than WPP PLC's net income of --. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while WPP PLC's PE ratio is 12.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.85x versus 0.46x for WPP PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 8.4% compared to Criteo SA's net margin of 15.52%. Criteo SA's return on equity of 13.14% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.42%.

Criteo SA has a consensus price target of $42.58, signalling upside risk potential of 49.63%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 68.77%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than Criteo SA, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than Criteo SA.

Criteo SA has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.466%.

Criteo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Criteo SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Criteo SA quarterly revenues are $451.4M, which are larger than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $412.8M. Criteo SA's net income of $37.9M is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Criteo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.57x while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 23.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Criteo SA is 0.85x versus 1.01x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.