VEEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net margin of --. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78% beat Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $315.17, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Veeva Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc., analysts believe Veeva Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc..

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.073%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $811.2M, which are larger than Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M is higher than Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Veeva Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.89x while Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Veeva Systems, Inc. is 13.09x versus 0.01x for Optimus Healthcare Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -60.37%. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78% beat Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $315.17, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Schrödinger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.22 which suggests that it could grow by 53.45%. Given that Schrödinger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Veeva Systems, Inc., analysts believe Schrödinger, Inc. is more attractive than Veeva Systems, Inc..

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.591%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schrödinger, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schrödinger, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $811.2M, which are larger than Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54.3M. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M is higher than Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M. Notably, Veeva Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.89x while Schrödinger, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Veeva Systems, Inc. is 13.09x versus 5.06x for Schrödinger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simulations Plus, Inc. has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -330.59%. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78% beat Simulations Plus, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.69%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $315.17, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Simulations Plus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.75%. Given that Veeva Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Simulations Plus, Inc., analysts believe Veeva Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Simulations Plus, Inc..

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simulations Plus, Inc. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.414%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Simulations Plus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus, Inc. pays out -48.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $811.2M, which are larger than Simulations Plus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.4M. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M is higher than Simulations Plus, Inc.'s net income of -$67.3M. Notably, Veeva Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.89x while Simulations Plus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Veeva Systems, Inc. is 13.09x versus 5.19x for Simulations Plus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Mobile Healthcare has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net margin of --. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78% beat Nano Mobile Healthcare's return on equity of --.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of $315.17, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Nano Mobile Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Veeva Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nano Mobile Healthcare, analysts believe Veeva Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Nano Mobile Healthcare.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Mobile Healthcare has a beta of -1.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 216.13%.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Mobile Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Mobile Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $811.2M, which are larger than Nano Mobile Healthcare quarterly revenues of --. Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M is higher than Nano Mobile Healthcare's net income of --. Notably, Veeva Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.89x while Nano Mobile Healthcare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Veeva Systems, Inc. is 13.09x versus -- for Nano Mobile Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.