SDGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Scienture Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -60.37% compared to Schrödinger, Inc.'s net margin of -611.42%. Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11% beat Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.88%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.22, signalling upside risk potential of 48.11%. On the other hand Scienture Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1160.5%. Given that Scienture Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Schrödinger, Inc., analysts believe Scienture Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Schrödinger, Inc..

Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.566, which suggesting that the stock is 56.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scienture Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.932%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scienture Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Schrödinger, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scienture Holdings, Inc. pays out 81.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.3M, which are larger than Scienture Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $590K. Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Schrödinger, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schrödinger, Inc. is 5.24x versus 10.51x for Scienture Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simulations Plus, Inc. has a net margin of -60.37% compared to Schrödinger, Inc.'s net margin of -330.59%. Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11% beat Simulations Plus, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.69%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.22, signalling upside risk potential of 48.11%. On the other hand Simulations Plus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Schrödinger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Simulations Plus, Inc., analysts believe Schrödinger, Inc. is more attractive than Simulations Plus, Inc..

Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.566, which suggesting that the stock is 56.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simulations Plus, Inc. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.414%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Simulations Plus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Schrödinger, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus, Inc. pays out -48.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.3M, which are larger than Simulations Plus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.4M. Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is higher than Simulations Plus, Inc.'s net income of -$67.3M. Notably, Schrödinger, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Simulations Plus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schrödinger, Inc. is 5.24x versus 4.89x for Simulations Plus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -60.37% compared to Schrödinger, Inc.'s net margin of 29.12%. Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11% beat Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.22, signalling upside risk potential of 48.11%. On the other hand Veeva Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $312.18 which suggests that it could grow by 39.9%. Given that Schrödinger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Veeva Systems, Inc., analysts believe Schrödinger, Inc. is more attractive than Veeva Systems, Inc..

Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.566, which suggesting that the stock is 56.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.265%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veeva Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Schrödinger, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.3M, which are smaller than Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $811.2M. Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M. Notably, Schrödinger, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Veeva Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schrödinger, Inc. is 5.24x versus 12.11x for Veeva Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Mobile Healthcare has a net margin of -60.37% compared to Schrödinger, Inc.'s net margin of --. Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11% beat Nano Mobile Healthcare's return on equity of --.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.22, signalling upside risk potential of 48.11%. On the other hand Nano Mobile Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schrödinger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nano Mobile Healthcare, analysts believe Schrödinger, Inc. is more attractive than Nano Mobile Healthcare.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.566, which suggesting that the stock is 56.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Mobile Healthcare has a beta of -1.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 216.13%.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Mobile Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Schrödinger, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Mobile Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.3M, which are larger than Nano Mobile Healthcare quarterly revenues of --. Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is higher than Nano Mobile Healthcare's net income of --. Notably, Schrödinger, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nano Mobile Healthcare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schrödinger, Inc. is 5.24x versus -- for Nano Mobile Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.