UTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 9.6%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $17.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.18%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $65.32 which suggests that it could grow by 20.89%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.048%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $352.1M, which are smaller than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 21.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 1.21x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 4.32%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $17.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.18%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.63 which suggests that it could grow by 9.47%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Mondelez International.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.72%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $352.1M, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 2.43x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 10.11%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $17.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.18%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of $82.19 which suggests that it could grow by 12.91%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than McCormick &.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.029%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $352.1M, which are smaller than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M is lower than McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 25.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 2.92x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of -0.09%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $17.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.18%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $25.29 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.965%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $352.1M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 0.04x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.