NAII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mondelez International, Inc. has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.66%. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.91% beat Mondelez International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.31%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mondelez International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $69.02 which suggests that it could grow by 25.71%. Given that Mondelez International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, Inc., analysts believe Mondelez International, Inc. is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International, Inc..

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International, Inc. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.206%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mondelez International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Natural Alternatives International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International, Inc. pays out 52.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than Mondelez International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net income of -$291K is lower than Mondelez International, Inc.'s net income of $746M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mondelez International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. is 0.16x versus 1.91x for Mondelez International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net margin of -821.05%. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.91% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe Natural Alternatives International, Inc. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.067%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Alternatives International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net income of -$291K is lower than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. is 0.16x versus 205.26x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.27%. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.91% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.08%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.71 which suggests that it could grow by 35.89%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, Inc., analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International, Inc..

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.382%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Natural Alternatives International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $733.5M. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net income of -$291K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $53.3M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. is 0.16x versus 0.53x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UTZ Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -0.78% compared to Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net margin of -5.35%. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.91% beat UTZ Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.17%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UTZ Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 64.41%. Given that UTZ Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, Inc., analysts believe UTZ Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International, Inc..

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.877% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UTZ Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.3%.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UTZ Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Natural Alternatives International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UTZ Brands, Inc. pays out 127.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37.3M, which are smaller than UTZ Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $377.8M. Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s net income of -$291K is higher than UTZ Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UTZ Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 151.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. is 0.16x versus 0.58x for UTZ Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.