NAII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mondelez International has a net margin of -5.98% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of 9.27%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -10.1% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.22%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.056%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $33.2M, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.22x versus 2.22x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of -5.98% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of --. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -10.1% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Alternatives International has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Natural Alternatives International is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $33.2M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.22x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -5.98% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of 3.7%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -10.1% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $33.2M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.22x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of -5.98% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of -0.6%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -10.1% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of -1%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.05%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.71000000000001%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out -74.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $33.2M, which are smaller than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $365.5M. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2M is higher than Utz Brands's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 566.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.22x versus 0.92x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.