UNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBIZ has a net margin of 4.06% compared to UniFirst's net margin of -19.71%. UniFirst's return on equity of 7.15% beat CBIZ's return on equity of 3.9%.

UniFirst has a consensus price target of $181.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand CBIZ has an analysts' consensus of $98.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.4%. Given that CBIZ has higher upside potential than UniFirst, analysts believe CBIZ is more attractive than UniFirst.

UniFirst has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBIZ has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.907%.

UniFirst has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. CBIZ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UniFirst pays 16.05% of its earnings as a dividend. CBIZ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. UniFirst's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UniFirst quarterly revenues are $602.2M, which are larger than CBIZ quarterly revenues of $460.3M. UniFirst's net income of $24.5M is higher than CBIZ's net income of -$90.7M. Notably, UniFirst's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.53x while CBIZ's PE ratio is 93.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UniFirst is 1.32x versus 2.21x for CBIZ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 4.06% compared to UniFirst's net margin of 17.76%. UniFirst's return on equity of 7.15% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

UniFirst has a consensus price target of $181.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $206.85 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that UniFirst has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe UniFirst is more attractive than Cintas.

UniFirst has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.05%.

UniFirst has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. UniFirst pays 16.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UniFirst quarterly revenues are $602.2M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. UniFirst's net income of $24.5M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, UniFirst's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.53x while Cintas's PE ratio is 47.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UniFirst is 1.32x versus 8.27x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exponent has a net margin of 4.06% compared to UniFirst's net margin of 17.25%. UniFirst's return on equity of 7.15% beat Exponent's return on equity of 27.88%.

UniFirst has a consensus price target of $181.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand Exponent has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.27%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than UniFirst, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than UniFirst.

UniFirst has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exponent has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.784%.

UniFirst has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Exponent offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. UniFirst pays 16.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent pays out 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UniFirst quarterly revenues are $602.2M, which are larger than Exponent quarterly revenues of $136.8M. UniFirst's net income of $24.5M is higher than Exponent's net income of $23.6M. Notably, UniFirst's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.53x while Exponent's PE ratio is 37.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UniFirst is 1.32x versus 7.37x for Exponent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 4.06% compared to UniFirst's net margin of 4.95%. UniFirst's return on equity of 7.15% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.63%.

UniFirst has a consensus price target of $181.67, signalling upside risk potential of 4.94%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.75%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than UniFirst, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than UniFirst.

UniFirst has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.17%.

UniFirst has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. UniFirst pays 16.05% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UniFirst quarterly revenues are $602.2M, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $496.3M. UniFirst's net income of $24.5M is lower than ICF International's net income of $24.6M. Notably, UniFirst's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.53x while ICF International's PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UniFirst is 1.32x versus 0.78x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.