UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 49.4% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 35.72%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.7% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $625.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.07%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.205%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $6.7B is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.63x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 3.89x versus 12.22x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 49.4% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -3797.18%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.7% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $514.71 which suggests that it could grow by 176.71%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 239.712%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $128.7M. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $6.7B is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of $2.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.63x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 3.89x versus 107.73x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle Corp. has a net margin of 49.4% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 19.93%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.7% beat Oracle Corp.'s return on equity of 71.43%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Oracle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $332.29 which suggests that it could grow by 55.04%. Given that Oracle Corp. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Oracle Corp. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle Corp. has a beta of 1.662, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.202%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle Corp. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp. pays out 39.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Oracle Corp. quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $6.7B is higher than Oracle Corp.'s net income of $3B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.63x while Oracle Corp.'s PE ratio is 49.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 3.89x versus 10.46x for Oracle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday, Inc. has a net margin of 49.4% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 10.38%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 72.7% beat Workday, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.19%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 23.36%. On the other hand Workday, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $275.64 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Workday, Inc. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Workday, Inc. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday, Inc. has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.195%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Workday, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $6.7B is higher than Workday, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.63x while Workday, Inc.'s PE ratio is 90.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 3.89x versus 6.30x for Workday, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.