UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce, Inc. has a net margin of 2.21% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 17.35%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.97% beat Salesforce, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.33%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.81, signalling upside risk potential of 42.27%. On the other hand Salesforce, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $276.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.66%. Given that Uber Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Salesforce, Inc., analysts believe Uber Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Salesforce, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.749%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc. pays out 21.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.4B, which are larger than Salesforce, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $317M is lower than Salesforce, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.45x while Salesforce, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 2.97x versus 4.59x for Salesforce, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit, Inc. has a net margin of 2.21% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 14.9%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.97% beat Intuit, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.57%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.81, signalling upside risk potential of 42.27%. On the other hand Intuit, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $606.43 which suggests that it could grow by 39.37%. Given that Uber Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intuit, Inc., analysts believe Uber Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Intuit, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit, Inc. has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.552%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit, Inc. pays out 30.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.4B, which are larger than Intuit, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $317M is lower than Intuit, Inc.'s net income of $693M. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.45x while Intuit, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 2.97x versus 6.08x for Intuit, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 2.21% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 47.32%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.97% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.81, signalling upside risk potential of 42.27%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $594.62 which suggests that it could grow by 47.97%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.058%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.4B, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $81.3B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $317M is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.45x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 2.97x versus 9.82x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle Corp. has a net margin of 2.21% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 21.96%. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.97% beat Oracle Corp.'s return on equity of 61.94%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.81, signalling upside risk potential of 42.27%. On the other hand Oracle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $248.60 which suggests that it could grow by 56.2%. Given that Oracle Corp. has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Oracle Corp. is more attractive than Uber Technologies, Inc..

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.733% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle Corp. has a beta of 1.658, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.751%.

Uber Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle Corp. offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Uber Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp. pays out 39.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.4B, which are smaller than Oracle Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.2B. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $317M is lower than Oracle Corp.'s net income of $3.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.45x while Oracle Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies, Inc. is 2.97x versus 7.21x for Oracle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.