UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -8.72%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $94.35, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $409.77 which suggests that it could fall by -0.19%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.019%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.50x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.91x versus 25.80x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 36.86%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $94.35, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.50x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.91x versus 12.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -8.03%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -7.97%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $94.35, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $144.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Cloudflare.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.782, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.196%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $479.1M. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.50x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.91x versus 25.66x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unity Software has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -17.85%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Unity Software's return on equity of -13.17%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $94.35, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Unity Software has an analysts' consensus of $26.61 which suggests that it could grow by 29.44%. Given that Unity Software has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Unity Software is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unity Software has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unity Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unity Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Unity Software quarterly revenues of $435M. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is higher than Unity Software's net income of -$77.6M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.50x while Unity Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.91x versus 4.62x for Unity Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.