TWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Holding has a net margin of 51.38% compared to Two Harbors Investment's net margin of 18.29%. Two Harbors Investment's return on equity of -18.84% beat Comstock Holding's return on equity of 15.96%.

Two Harbors Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand Comstock Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.28%. Given that Two Harbors Investment has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe Two Harbors Investment is more attractive than Comstock Holding.

Two Harbors Investment has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.056%.

Two Harbors Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.16%. Comstock Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Two Harbors Investment pays -231.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Two Harbors Investment quarterly revenues are -$210.6M, which are smaller than Comstock Holding quarterly revenues of $13M. Two Harbors Investment's net income of -$238.5M is lower than Comstock Holding's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Two Harbors Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.32x while Comstock Holding's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Two Harbors Investment is 4.45x versus 1.80x for Comstock Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diversified Healthcare Trust has a net margin of 51.38% compared to Two Harbors Investment's net margin of -26.41%. Two Harbors Investment's return on equity of -18.84% beat Diversified Healthcare Trust's return on equity of -17.17%.

Two Harbors Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand Diversified Healthcare Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 52.17%. Given that Diversified Healthcare Trust has higher upside potential than Two Harbors Investment, analysts believe Diversified Healthcare Trust is more attractive than Two Harbors Investment.

Two Harbors Investment has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diversified Healthcare Trust has a beta of 2.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.474%.

Two Harbors Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.16%. Diversified Healthcare Trust offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Two Harbors Investment pays -231.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Diversified Healthcare Trust pays out -3.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Two Harbors Investment quarterly revenues are -$210.6M, which are smaller than Diversified Healthcare Trust quarterly revenues of $373.6M. Two Harbors Investment's net income of -$238.5M is lower than Diversified Healthcare Trust's net income of -$98.7M. Notably, Two Harbors Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.32x while Diversified Healthcare Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Two Harbors Investment is 4.45x versus 0.37x for Diversified Healthcare Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New England Realty Associates LP has a net margin of 51.38% compared to Two Harbors Investment's net margin of 19.35%. Two Harbors Investment's return on equity of -18.84% beat New England Realty Associates LP's return on equity of --.

Two Harbors Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand New England Realty Associates LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Two Harbors Investment has higher upside potential than New England Realty Associates LP, analysts believe Two Harbors Investment is more attractive than New England Realty Associates LP.

Two Harbors Investment has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New England Realty Associates LP has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.437%.

Two Harbors Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.16%. New England Realty Associates LP offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Two Harbors Investment pays -231.83% of its earnings as a dividend. New England Realty Associates LP pays out 117.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Two Harbors Investment quarterly revenues are -$210.6M, which are smaller than New England Realty Associates LP quarterly revenues of $20.2M. Two Harbors Investment's net income of -$238.5M is lower than New England Realty Associates LP's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Two Harbors Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.32x while New England Realty Associates LP's PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Two Harbors Investment is 4.45x versus 3.59x for New England Realty Associates LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Holdings has a net margin of 51.38% compared to Two Harbors Investment's net margin of -113.92%. Two Harbors Investment's return on equity of -18.84% beat Star Holdings's return on equity of 20.77%.

Two Harbors Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand Star Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Two Harbors Investment has higher upside potential than Star Holdings, analysts believe Two Harbors Investment is more attractive than Star Holdings.

Two Harbors Investment has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Two Harbors Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.16%. Star Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Two Harbors Investment pays -231.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Two Harbors Investment quarterly revenues are -$210.6M, which are smaller than Star Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.6M. Two Harbors Investment's net income of -$238.5M is lower than Star Holdings's net income of $91.9M. Notably, Two Harbors Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.32x while Star Holdings's PE ratio is 1.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Two Harbors Investment is 4.45x versus 1.32x for Star Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.