RWT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlaqClouds, Inc. has a net margin of -2.9% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net margin of -282.83%. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.04% beat BlaqClouds, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.84%. On the other hand BlaqClouds, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Redwood Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than BlaqClouds, Inc., analysts believe Redwood Trust, Inc. is more attractive than BlaqClouds, Inc..

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlaqClouds, Inc. has a beta of -12.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1335.696%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. BlaqClouds, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redwood Trust, Inc. pays 207.82% of its earnings as a dividend. BlaqClouds, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redwood Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $313M, which are larger than BlaqClouds, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.3K. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$9.1M is lower than BlaqClouds, Inc.'s net income of -$65.9K. Notably, Redwood Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.41x while BlaqClouds, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redwood Trust, Inc. is 0.61x versus 21.63x for BlaqClouds, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equity Residential has a net margin of -2.9% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 49.62%. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.04% beat Equity Residential's return on equity of 10%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.84%. On the other hand Equity Residential has an analysts' consensus of $69.90 which suggests that it could grow by 8.13%. Given that Redwood Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Equity Residential, analysts believe Redwood Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Equity Residential.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equity Residential has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.261%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Equity Residential offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Redwood Trust, Inc. pays 207.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Equity Residential pays out 94.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Equity Residential's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Redwood Trust, Inc.'s is not.

Redwood Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $313M, which are smaller than Equity Residential quarterly revenues of $789M. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$9.1M is lower than Equity Residential's net income of $391.5M. Notably, Redwood Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.41x while Equity Residential's PE ratio is 22.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redwood Trust, Inc. is 0.61x versus 8.20x for Equity Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New England Realty Associates LP has a net margin of -2.9% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net margin of -2.2%. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.04% beat New England Realty Associates LP's return on equity of --.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.84%. On the other hand New England Realty Associates LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Redwood Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than New England Realty Associates LP, analysts believe Redwood Trust, Inc. is more attractive than New England Realty Associates LP.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New England Realty Associates LP has a beta of 0.152, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.759%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. New England Realty Associates LP offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Redwood Trust, Inc. pays 207.82% of its earnings as a dividend. New England Realty Associates LP pays out 35.87% of its earnings as a dividend. New England Realty Associates LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Redwood Trust, Inc.'s is not.

Redwood Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $313M, which are larger than New England Realty Associates LP quarterly revenues of $23.7M. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$9.1M is lower than New England Realty Associates LP's net income of -$521.8K. Notably, Redwood Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.41x while New England Realty Associates LP's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redwood Trust, Inc. is 0.61x versus 2.64x for New England Realty Associates LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Two Harbors Investment Corp. has a net margin of -2.9% compared to Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 5.29%. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.04% beat Two Harbors Investment Corp.'s return on equity of -23.38%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.84%. On the other hand Two Harbors Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.30 which suggests that it could grow by 13.47%. Given that Redwood Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Two Harbors Investment Corp., analysts believe Redwood Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Two Harbors Investment Corp..

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Two Harbors Investment Corp. has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.656%.

Redwood Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Two Harbors Investment Corp. offers a yield of 14.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Redwood Trust, Inc. pays 207.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Two Harbors Investment Corp. pays out 75.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Two Harbors Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Redwood Trust, Inc.'s is not.

Redwood Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $313M, which are larger than Two Harbors Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of $221.4M. Redwood Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$9.1M is lower than Two Harbors Investment Corp.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, Redwood Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.41x while Two Harbors Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redwood Trust, Inc. is 0.61x versus 1.41x for Two Harbors Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.