TOST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiserv has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Toast's net margin of 16.59%. Toast's return on equity of 1.43% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $42.44, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $227.42 which suggests that it could grow by 23.55%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Toast.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.044%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Toast's net income of $32M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $851M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fiserv's PE ratio is 32.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.98x versus 5.11x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Samsara has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Toast's net margin of -3.24%. Toast's return on equity of 1.43% beat Samsara's return on equity of -15.9%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $42.44, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Samsara has an analysts' consensus of $47.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.69%. Given that Samsara has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Samsara is more attractive than Toast.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsara has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsara offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsara pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Samsara quarterly revenues of $346.3M. Toast's net income of $32M is higher than Samsara's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Samsara's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.98x versus 19.28x for Samsara. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Toast's net margin of 24.22%. Toast's return on equity of 1.43% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $42.44, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $94.23 which suggests that it could fall by -19.67%. Given that Toast has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Toast is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. Toast's net income of $32M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 510.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.98x versus 93.72x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Toast's net margin of -1.19%. Toast's return on equity of 1.43% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22%.

Toast has a consensus price target of $42.44, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $236.83 which suggests that it could grow by 1.62%. Given that Toast has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe Toast is more attractive than Zscaler.

Toast has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.534%.

Toast has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toast pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Toast quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $647.9M. Toast's net income of $32M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Toast's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toast is 4.98x versus 14.72x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.