SQNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Endava Plc has a net margin of -155.05% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of -4.58%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of -29.99% beat Endava Plc's return on equity of 1.62%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 223.93%. On the other hand Endava Plc has an analysts' consensus of $10.70 which suggests that it could grow by 65.14%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Endava Plc, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Endava Plc.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 73.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endava Plc has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.648%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endava Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endava Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Endava Plc quarterly revenues of $240.3M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$6.6M is higher than Endava Plc's net income of -$11M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.40x while Endava Plc's PE ratio is 32.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 0.52x versus 0.38x for Endava Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a net margin of -155.05% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 20.09%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of -29.99% beat Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 223.93%. On the other hand Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has an analysts' consensus of $8.87 which suggests that it could fall by -9.75%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 73.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.001%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays out 32511.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$6.6M is lower than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.40x while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 0.52x versus 1.35x for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Materialise NV has a net margin of -155.05% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 2.79%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of -29.99% beat Materialise NV's return on equity of 1.77%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 223.93%. On the other hand Materialise NV has an analysts' consensus of $8.95 which suggests that it could grow by 48.02%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Materialise NV, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Materialise NV.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 73.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Materialise NV has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.502%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Materialise NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Materialise NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Materialise NV quarterly revenues of $77.4M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$6.6M is lower than Materialise NV's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.40x while Materialise NV's PE ratio is 72.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 0.52x versus 1.23x for Materialise NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nokia Oyj has a net margin of -155.05% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 1.64%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of -29.99% beat Nokia Oyj's return on equity of 4.07%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 223.93%. On the other hand Nokia Oyj has an analysts' consensus of $6.63 which suggests that it could grow by 5.97%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Nokia Oyj, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Nokia Oyj.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.262, which suggesting that the stock is 73.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokia Oyj has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.188%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nokia Oyj offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nokia Oyj pays out -41.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Nokia Oyj quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$6.6M is lower than Nokia Oyj's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.40x while Nokia Oyj's PE ratio is 35.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 0.52x versus 1.57x for Nokia Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.