Financhill
Buy
89

FORM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$96.06
Seasonality move :
0.34%
Day range:
$93.05 - $97.38
52-week range:
$22.58 - $97.38
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
139.07x
P/S ratio:
9.55x
P/B ratio:
7.38x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1.6M
1-year change:
174.56%
Market cap:
$7.4B
Revenue:
$785M
EPS (TTM):
$0.69

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
$210.6M $0.35 31.43% 431.23% $84.11
AMKR
Amkor Technology, Inc.
$1.8B $0.44 23.2% 181.83% $56.25
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
$534.5M $2.44 3.77% 22.25% $144.67
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$3.3B $8.80 9.96% 10.52% $1,665.28
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$12.9B $3.96 133.61% 502.04% $382.23
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
$220.1M $0.53 3.75% -22.49% $42.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
$96.07 $84.11 $7.4B 139.07x $0.00 0% 9.55x
AMKR
Amkor Technology, Inc.
$56.17 $56.25 $13.9B 37.33x $0.08 0.59% 2.08x
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
$141.18 $144.67 $7.2B 18.59x $0.00 0% 3.82x
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$1,479.50 $1,665.28 $193.9B 42.98x $1.90 0.5% 15.40x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$410.34 $382.23 $461.8B 39.01x $0.12 0.11% 10.95x
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
$38.10 $42.00 $2.3B 16.64x $0.00 0% 2.69x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
3.03% 3.081 0.75% 3.24x
AMKR
Amkor Technology, Inc.
25.33% 2.466 15.49% 1.95x
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
6.13% 1.018 2.27% 5.98x
KLAC
KLA Corp.
52.78% 1.903 3.83% 1.86x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
17.52% 3.611 4.69% 1.52x
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
0.51% 0.321 0.33% 4.81x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
$92.2M $28.1M 5.3% 5.49% 13.07% $34.7M
AMKR
Amkor Technology, Inc.
$314.6M $185M 6.38% 8.77% 9.8% $212.4M
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
$308.1M $152.9M 18.88% 20.22% 26.34% $285.7M
KLAC
KLA Corp.
$2B $1.4B 42.85% 100.25% 41.01% $1.3B
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$7.6B $6.1B 17.9% 22.98% 44.95% $3B
PLAB
Photronics, Inc.
$75.5M $52.3M 12.45% 12.5% 24.26% $20.2M

FormFactor, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FORM or AMKR?

    Amkor Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 10.79% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 9.14%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.49% beat Amkor Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    42.84% $0.29 $1.1B
    AMKR
    Amkor Technology, Inc.
    16.66% $0.69 $6B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORM or AMKR?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.11, signalling downside risk potential of -12.45%. On the other hand Amkor Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.14%. Given that Amkor Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Amkor Technology, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    4 6 0
    AMKR
    Amkor Technology, Inc.
    1 6 0
  • Is FORM or AMKR More Risky?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amkor Technology, Inc. has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.685%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORM or AMKR?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amkor Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology, Inc. pays out 22.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORM or AMKR?

    FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Amkor Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M is lower than Amkor Technology, Inc.'s net income of $172.5M. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.07x while Amkor Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 9.55x versus 2.08x for Amkor Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    9.55x 139.07x $215.2M $23.2M
    AMKR
    Amkor Technology, Inc.
    2.08x 37.33x $1.9B $172.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns FORM or CRUS?

    Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a net margin of 10.79% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 24.17%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.49% beat Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    42.84% $0.29 $1.1B
    CRUS
    Cirrus Logic, Inc.
    53.07% $2.66 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORM or CRUS?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.11, signalling downside risk potential of -12.45%. On the other hand Cirrus Logic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $144.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.47%. Given that Cirrus Logic, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Cirrus Logic, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    4 6 0
    CRUS
    Cirrus Logic, Inc.
    4 3 0
  • Is FORM or CRUS More Risky?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.893%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORM or CRUS?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cirrus Logic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORM or CRUS?

    FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $580.6M. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M is lower than Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $140.3M. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.07x while Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 9.55x versus 3.82x for Cirrus Logic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    9.55x 139.07x $215.2M $23.2M
    CRUS
    Cirrus Logic, Inc.
    3.82x 18.59x $580.6M $140.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns FORM or KLAC?

    KLA Corp. has a net margin of 10.79% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 34.77%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.49% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 100.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    42.84% $0.29 $1.1B
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    59.62% $8.73 $11.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORM or KLAC?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.11, signalling downside risk potential of -12.45%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,665.28 which suggests that it could grow by 12.56%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    4 6 0
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    13 13 0
  • Is FORM or KLAC More Risky?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.659%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORM or KLAC?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORM or KLAC?

    FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.07x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 9.55x versus 15.40x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    9.55x 139.07x $215.2M $23.2M
    KLAC
    KLA Corp.
    15.40x 42.98x $3.3B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns FORM or MU?

    Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 10.79% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.49% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    42.84% $0.29 $1.1B
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    56% $4.60 $71.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORM or MU?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.11, signalling downside risk potential of -12.45%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $382.23 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that FormFactor, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    4 6 0
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    28 3 2
  • Is FORM or MU More Risky?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.672%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORM or MU?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORM or MU?

    FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.07x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 9.55x versus 10.95x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    9.55x 139.07x $215.2M $23.2M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    10.95x 39.01x $13.6B $5.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns FORM or PLAB?

    Photronics, Inc. has a net margin of 10.79% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 36.44%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.49% beat Photronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    42.84% $0.29 $1.1B
    PLAB
    Photronics, Inc.
    35.01% $1.07 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About FORM or PLAB?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $84.11, signalling downside risk potential of -12.45%. On the other hand Photronics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.24%. Given that Photronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Photronics, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    4 6 0
    PLAB
    Photronics, Inc.
    1 0 0
  • Is FORM or PLAB More Risky?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Photronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.142%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FORM or PLAB?

    FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Photronics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Photronics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FORM or PLAB?

    FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Photronics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.8M. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $23.2M is lower than Photronics, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.07x while Photronics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 9.55x versus 2.69x for Photronics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FORM
    FormFactor, Inc.
    9.55x 139.07x $215.2M $23.2M
    PLAB
    Photronics, Inc.
    2.69x 16.64x $215.8M $78.6M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is up 29.7% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is up 26.39% over the past day.

Buy
73
AEHR alert for Feb 12

Aehr Test Systems [AEHR] is up 26.09% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock