FORM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 23.46%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.57, signalling downside risk potential of -23.83%. On the other hand Cirrus Logic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that Cirrus Logic, Inc. has higher upside potential than FormFactor, Inc., analysts believe Cirrus Logic, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.632%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cirrus Logic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $561M. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $131.6M. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 158.91x while Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 8.55x versus 3.63x for Cirrus Logic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 34.93%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.57, signalling downside risk potential of -23.83%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,466.69 which suggests that it could fall by -3.51%. Given that FormFactor, Inc. has more downside risk than KLA Corp., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.735%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 158.91x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 8.55x versus 16.16x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research Corp. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 29.46%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Lam Research Corp.'s return on equity of 62.02%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.57, signalling downside risk potential of -23.83%. On the other hand Lam Research Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $206.13 which suggests that it could fall by -9.75%. Given that FormFactor, Inc. has more downside risk than Lam Research Corp., analysts believe Lam Research Corp. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research Corp. has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.372%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lam Research Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp. pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Lam Research Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Lam Research Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 158.91x while Lam Research Corp.'s PE ratio is 50.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 8.55x versus 14.94x for Lam Research Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 7.73% compared to FormFactor, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. FormFactor, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.57, signalling downside risk potential of -23.83%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $350.36 which suggests that it could fall by -9.96%. Given that FormFactor, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than FormFactor, Inc..

FormFactor, Inc. has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.087%.

FormFactor, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. FormFactor, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FormFactor, Inc. quarterly revenues are $202.7M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. FormFactor, Inc.'s net income of $15.7M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, FormFactor, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 158.91x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FormFactor, Inc. is 8.55x versus 10.38x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.