SPLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1847 Holdings LLC has a net margin of 7% compared to Steel Partners Holdings LP's net margin of 59.12%. Steel Partners Holdings LP's return on equity of 22.21% beat 1847 Holdings LLC's return on equity of --.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 1847 Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Partners Holdings LP has higher upside potential than 1847 Holdings LLC, analysts believe Steel Partners Holdings LP is more attractive than 1847 Holdings LLC.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1847 Holdings LLC has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.71%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1847 Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steel Partners Holdings LP pays 6.39% of its earnings as a dividend. 1847 Holdings LLC pays out -0.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Partners Holdings LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Partners Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $520.4M, which are larger than 1847 Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Steel Partners Holdings LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than 1847 Holdings LLC's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Steel Partners Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.35x while 1847 Holdings LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Partners Holdings LP is 0.52x versus 0.00x for 1847 Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Honeywell International has a net margin of 7% compared to Steel Partners Holdings LP's net margin of 14.53%. Steel Partners Holdings LP's return on equity of 22.21% beat Honeywell International's return on equity of 32.75%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Honeywell International has an analysts' consensus of $246.81 which suggests that it could grow by 8.1%. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Steel Partners Holdings LP, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Steel Partners Holdings LP.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Honeywell International has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.25%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Honeywell International offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Steel Partners Holdings LP pays 6.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International pays out 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Partners Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $520.4M, which are smaller than Honeywell International quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Steel Partners Holdings LP's net income of $36.4M is lower than Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Steel Partners Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.35x while Honeywell International's PE ratio is 26.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Partners Holdings LP is 0.52x versus 3.96x for Honeywell International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of 7% compared to Steel Partners Holdings LP's net margin of -70.61%. Steel Partners Holdings LP's return on equity of 22.21% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Partners Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Steel Partners Holdings LP is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of -0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.103%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steel Partners Holdings LP pays 6.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Partners Holdings LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Partners Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $520.4M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Steel Partners Holdings LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Steel Partners Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.35x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Partners Holdings LP is 0.52x versus 7.88x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of 7% compared to Steel Partners Holdings LP's net margin of -6.72%. Steel Partners Holdings LP's return on equity of 22.21% beat Seaboard's return on equity of -0.04%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Partners Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Steel Partners Holdings LP is more attractive than Seaboard.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a beta of 1.378, which suggesting that the stock is 37.845% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.355, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.533%.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Steel Partners Holdings LP pays 6.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 4.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Partners Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $520.4M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Steel Partners Holdings LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than Seaboard's net income of -$149M. Notably, Steel Partners Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.35x while Seaboard's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Partners Holdings LP is 0.52x versus 0.27x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.